These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23114191)

  • 1. Revision hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless stem: mid-term follow up.
    Jibodh SR; Schwarzkopf R; Anthony SG; Malchau H; Dempsey KE; Estok DM
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1167-72. PubMed ID: 23114191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Not all cementless femoral stems are created equal but the results may be comparable.
    Carlson SW; Liu SS; Callaghan JJ
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):14-17. PubMed ID: 28042113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
    Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
    Kim YH; Kim JS
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular, Cementless Femoral Stem: Intermediate-Term Follow-Up.
    Sivananthan S; Lim CT; Narkbunnam R; Sox-Harris A; Huddleston JI; Goodman SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1245-1249. PubMed ID: 27923596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.
    Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL
    Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty mean 9-year results.
    Surdam JW; Archibeck MJ; Schultz SC; Junick DW; White RE
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 17275634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
    Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
    Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modern Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem.
    Wallace CN; Chang JS; Kayani B; Moriarty PD; Tahmassebi JE; Haddad FS
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3697-3702. PubMed ID: 32713726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up.
    Kang JS; Na Y; Ko BS; Jeon YS
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(3):2309499018812241. PubMed ID: 30449250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral revision in total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular stem: clinical and radiological results with a 8-year follow-up.
    Spranz D; Skrobek D; Randoll J; Kinkel S; Merle C; Walker T; Renkawitz T; Reiner T
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Mar; 144(3):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 37872437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless femoral stem.
    Pelt CE; Madsen W; Erickson JA; Gililland JM; Anderson MB; Peters CL
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1803-7. PubMed ID: 24929283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mid-Term Results of Modular Tapered Femoral Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Marfo KA; Berend KR; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Lombardi AV
    Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():295-300. PubMed ID: 31087320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
    Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component.
    Amanatullah DF; Howard JL; Siman H; Trousdale RT; Mabry TM; Berry DJ
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25737513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.