164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23114416)
21. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?
Ramaswamy R; Evans S; Kosashvili Y
Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19747678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Salvaging the pullout strength of stripped screws in osteoporotic bone.
Pechon PH; Mears SC; Langdale ER; Belkoff SM
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 4(2):50-2. PubMed ID: 24093076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of screw pullout strength: a function of screw orientation in subtalar joint arthrodesis.
McGlamry MC; Robitaille MF
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2004; 43(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 15480401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.
Seller K; Wahl D; Wild A; Krauspe R; Schneider E; Linke B
Eur Spine J; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1047-54. PubMed ID: 17273838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The biomechanical effect of artificial and human bone density on stopping and stripping torque during screw insertion.
Tsuji M; Crookshank M; Olsen M; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Jun; 22():146-56. PubMed ID: 23578764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of pilot hole size and bone density on miniscrew implants' stability.
Hung E; Oliver D; Kim KB; Kyung HM; Buschang PH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20345986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of insertional temperature on the pullout strength of pedicle screws inserted into thoracic vertebrae: an in vitro calf study.
Tosun B; Snmazçelik T; Buluç L; Cürgül I; Sarlak AY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):E667-72. PubMed ID: 18758347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Non-locking screw insertion: No benefit seen if tightness exceeds 80% of the maximum torque.
Fletcher JWA; Ehrhardt B; MacLeod A; Whitehouse MR; Gill H; Preatoni E
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Dec; 70():40-45. PubMed ID: 31386975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Loosening of sacral screw fixation under in vitro fatigue loading.
Lu WW; Zhu Q; Holmes AD; Luk KD; Zhong S; Leong JC
J Orthop Res; 2000 Sep; 18(5):808-14. PubMed ID: 11117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pullout strength of cancellous screws in human femoral heads depends on applied insertion torque, trabecular bone microarchitecture and areal bone mineral density.
Ab-Lazid R; Perilli E; Ryan MK; Costi JJ; Reynolds KJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Dec; 40():354-361. PubMed ID: 25265033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pullout strength of pedicle screws augmented with particulate calcium phosphate: an experimental study.
Hashemi A; Bednar D; Ziada S
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 18790679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of pullout strength for pedicle screws of different designs: a study using tapped and untapped pilot holes.
Pfeiffer FM; Abernathie DL; Smith DE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):E867-70. PubMed ID: 17077722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Calcium phosphate cement augmentation of cancellous bone screws can compensate for the absence of cortical fixation.
Stadelmann VA; Bretton E; Terrier A; Procter P; Pioletti DP
J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2869-74. PubMed ID: 20728888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities-an ex vivo biomechanical study.
Kim YY; Choi WS; Rhyu KW
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 22336467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical measurements of cortical screw purchase in five types of human and artificial humeri.
Aziz MS; Nicayenzi B; Crookshank MC; Bougherara H; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():159-67. PubMed ID: 24295967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pullout strength of monocortical and bicortical screws in metaphyseal and diaphyseal regions of the canine humerus.
Vaughn DP; Syrcle JA; Ball JE; Elder SH; Gambino JM; Griffin RL; McLaughlin RM
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Nov; 29(6):466-474. PubMed ID: 27709222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
