124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23114449)
1. [Systematic assessment and improvement of medical data quality].
Jacke CO; Kalder M; Koller M; Wagner U; Albert US
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2012 Nov; 55(11-12):1495-503. PubMed ID: 23114449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Indicators of data quality: revision of a guideline for networked medical research.
Stausberg J; Pritzkuleit R; Schmidt CO; Schrader T; Nonnemacher M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():711-5. PubMed ID: 22874284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Measuring quality in the German Guideline Programme in Oncology (GGPO)—methodology and implementation].
Nothacker M; Muche-Borowski C; Kopp IB
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):470-80. PubMed ID: 25523845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
Malin JL; Kahn KL; Adams J; Kwan L; Laouri M; Ganz PA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):835-44. PubMed ID: 12048271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Task-independent metrics to assess the data quality of medical registries using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Database.
Salati M; Brunelli A; Dahan M; Rocco G; Van Raemdonck DE; Varela G;
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 21168341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study design, process and outcome indicators of post-authorization studies aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimization measures in the EU PAS Register.
Farcas A; Huruba M; Mogosan C
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2019 Mar; 85(3):476-491. PubMed ID: 30497102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adherence to quality indicators and survival in patients with breast cancer.
Cheng SH; Wang CJ; Lin JL; Horng CF; Lu MC; Asch SM; Hilborne LH; Liu MC; Chen CM; Huang AT
Med Care; 2009 Feb; 47(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 19169123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paper 3: EUROCAT data quality indicators for population-based registries of congenital anomalies.
Loane M; Dolk H; Garne E; Greenlees R;
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2011 Mar; 91 Suppl 1():S23-30. PubMed ID: 21384530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Benchmarking: how to measure outcome quality at the comprehensive oncology centre in Stuttgart].
Meisner C; Brinkmann F; Henke D; Junack C; Faisst S; Heidemann E
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(5):365-70. PubMed ID: 21767795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Measurement and assessment of study quality and reporting quality].
Blümle A; von Elm E; Antes G; Meerpohl JJ
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):495-503. PubMed ID: 25523848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team (CANHEART): using big data to measure and improve cardiovascular health and healthcare services.
Tu JV; Chu A; Donovan LR; Ko DT; Booth GL; Tu K; Maclagan LC; Guo H; Austin PC; Hogg W; Kapral MK; Wijeysundera HC; Atzema CL; Gershon AS; Alter DA; Lee DS; Jackevicius CA; Bhatia RS; Udell JA; Rezai MR; Stukel TA
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2015 Mar; 8(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 25648464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Health services research in surgery: the example of breast cancer surgery].
Geraedts M
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Feb; 49(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 16416110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring Data Quality: A Review of the Literature between 2005 and 2013.
Stausberg J; Nasseh D; Nonnemacher M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():712-6. PubMed ID: 25991245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic approach towards the development of a set of quality indicators for public reporting in community-based maternity care.
Voerman GE; Calsbeek H; Maassen IT; Wiegers TA; Braspenning J
Midwifery; 2013 Apr; 29(4):316-24. PubMed ID: 23357096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Valid comparisons and decisions based on clinical registers and population based cohort studies: assessing the accuracy, completeness and epidemiological relevance of a breast cancer query database.
Jacke CO; Kalder M; Wagner U; Albert US
BMC Res Notes; 2012 Dec; 5():700. PubMed ID: 23270464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uses of cancer registries for public health and clinical research in Europe: Results of the European Network of Cancer Registries survey among 161 population-based cancer registries during 2010-2012.
Siesling S; Louwman WJ; Kwast A; van den Hurk C; O'Callaghan M; Rosso S; Zanetti R; Storm H; Comber H; Steliarova-Foucher E; Coebergh JW
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1039-49. PubMed ID: 25131265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Review article: Use of renal registry data for research, health-care planning and quality improvement: what can we learn from registry data in the Asia-Pacific region?
Lim TO; Goh A; Lim YN; Morad Z
Nephrology (Carlton); 2008 Dec; 13(8):745-52. PubMed ID: 19154324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The adherence paradox: guideline deviations contribute to the increased 5-year survival of breast cancer patients.
Jacke CO; Albert US; Kalder M
BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():734. PubMed ID: 26481452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality Management in healthcare--a bureaucratic evil or an indispensable medical duty?
Hinrichs A
Vasa; 2011 Mar; 40(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 21591471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Guideline compliance in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure through family doctor-centred health care: results of an evaluation study].
Roehl I; Beyer M; Gondan M; Rochon J; Bauer E; Kaufmann-Kolle P; Gerlach FM
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(6):394-402. PubMed ID: 24075681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
