254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23114747)
1. Quality assessment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a running nationwide Austrian benchmarking project after 5 years of implementation.
Kapral C; Mühlberger A; Wewalka F; Duller C; Knoflach P; Schreiber F;
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Dec; 24(12):1447-54. PubMed ID: 23114747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project.
Kapral C; Duller C; Wewalka F; Kerstan E; Vogel W; Schreiber F
Endoscopy; 2008 Aug; 40(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 18680074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study.
Colton JB; Curran CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 19482278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving ERCP quality and decreasing risk to patients and providers.
Kachaamy TA; Faigel DO
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Aug; 7(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 23985002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Austrian benchmarking project for ERCP: a 10-year report].
Kienbauer M; Duller C; Gschwantler M; Püspök A; Schöfl R; Kapral C
Z Gastroenterol; 2018 Oct; 56(10):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 30107618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study.
Testoni PA; Mariani A; Giussani A; Vailati C; Masci E; Macarri G; Ghezzo L; Familiari L; Giardullo N; Mutignani M; Lombardi G; Talamini G; Spadaccini A; Briglia R; Piazzi L;
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 105(8):1753-61. PubMed ID: 20372116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: a prospective single center study.
Suissa A; Yassin K; Lavy A; Lachter J; Chermech I; Karban A; Tamir A; Eliakim R
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(62):352-5. PubMed ID: 15816433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patterns and predictive factors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Glomsaker T; Hoff G; Kvaløy JT; Søreide K; Aabakken L; Søreide JA;
Br J Surg; 2013 Feb; 100(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 23225493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dye-free wire-guided cannulation of the biliary tree during ERCP is associated with high success and low complication rates: outcomes in a single operator experience of 822 cases.
Adler DG; Verma D; Hilden K; Chadha R; Thomas K
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Mar; 44(3):e57-62. PubMed ID: 19636260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ERCP in the community: the benchmarks have been set.
Nagar AB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):468-70. PubMed ID: 19699978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography grading system: A prospective study from a tertiary care center.
Torun S; Parlak E; Yıldız H; Dişibeyaz S; Ödemiş B; Beyazıt Y; Şaşmaz N; Kayaçetin E
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 27(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 26853789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study of complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound in an ambulatory endoscopy center.
Mahnke D; Chen YK; Antillon MR; Brown WR; Mattison R; Shah RJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 4(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 16797251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Lal D; Lane M; Wong P
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1177):U496. PubMed ID: 12861310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contemporary use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a Norwegian prospective, multicenter study.
Glomsaker T; Søreide K; Hoff G; Aabakken L; Søreide JA;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):1144-51. PubMed ID: 21692712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Complications in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. Prospective study].
Güitrón-Cantú A; Adalid-Martínez R; Gutiérrez-Bermúdez JA; Nieves-Rentería A; Alvarez-Valdés G
Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2007; 72(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 18402212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Can endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography be made a low-risk procedure?].
Hansen MB; Pilsgaard B; Meisner S
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Jun; 168(25):2462-7. PubMed ID: 16824371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is useful and safe in children.
Paris C; Bejjani J; Beaunoyer M; Ouimet A
J Pediatr Surg; 2010 May; 45(5):938-42. PubMed ID: 20438931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Success and complication rates of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography--a prospective study].
Zinsser E; Hoffmann A; Will U; Koppe P; Bosseckert H
Z Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 37(8):707-13. PubMed ID: 10494605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: A surgeon's perspective.
Prasil P; Laberge JM; Barkun A; Flageole H
J Pediatr Surg; 2001 May; 36(5):733-5. PubMed ID: 11329577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Point-of-care electronic prompts: an effective means of increasing compliance, demonstrating quality, and improving outcome.
Schwann NM; Bretz KA; Eid S; Burger T; Fry D; Ackler F; Evans P; Romancheck D; Beck M; Ardire AJ; Lukens H; McLoughlin TM
Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 21788319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
