These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23115148)

  • 1. Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques.
    Dahlke WO; Cottam MR; Herring MC; Leavitt JM; Ditmyer MM; Walker RS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Nov; 143(11):1199-204. PubMed ID: 23115148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious diseases.
    Kumbargere Nagraj S; Eachempati P; Paisi M; Nasser M; Sivaramakrishnan G; Verbeek JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 10(10):CD013686. PubMed ID: 33047816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatter contamination in dental practices--how can it be prevented?
    Graetz C; Bielfeldt J; Tillner A; Plaumann A; Dörfer CE
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(4):1122-34. PubMed ID: 25581979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of suction device with saliva ejector for aerosol and spatter reduction during ultrasonic scaling.
    Holloman JL; Mauriello SM; Pimenta L; Arnold RR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Jan; 146(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 25569495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness and aerosol containment of eight dry-field isolation techniques.
    Ravenel TD; Kessler R; Comisi JC; Kelly A; Renne WG; Teich ST
    Quintessence Int; 2020; 51(8):660-670. PubMed ID: 32661521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical investigation of dental evacuation systems in reducing aerosols.
    Suprono MS; Won J; Savignano R; Zhong Z; Ahmed A; Roque-Torres G; Zhang W; Oyoyo U; Richardson P; Caruso J; Handysides R; Li Y
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Jun; 152(6):455-462. PubMed ID: 34044977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of three dry-field techniques on intraoral temperature and relative humidity.
    Kameyama A; Asami M; Noro A; Abo H; Hirai Y; Tsunoda M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Mar; 142(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 21357861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Different Isolation Methods on Bioaerosol Distribution: An In Vitro Study.
    Westberg ME; Gregory RL; Jones JE; Yepes JF; Eckert GJ; Scully AC
    Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 46(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 38822496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The usefulness of the modified extra-oral vacuum aspirator (EOVA) from household vacuum cleaner in reducing bacteria in dental aerosols.
    Teanpaisan R; Taeporamaysamai M; Rattanachone P; Poldoung N; Srisintorn S
    Int Dent J; 2001 Dec; 51(6):413-6. PubMed ID: 11789707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aerosol and spatter mitigation in dentistry: Analysis of the effectiveness of 13 setups.
    Comisi JC; Ravenel TD; Kelly A; Teich ST; Renne W
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):466-479. PubMed ID: 33522677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical techniques of performing suctioning tasks and of positioning the high volume evacuation (HVE) attachment and inlet when assisting a dentist. A guide for dental assistants: part 2.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(6):6, 8, 10-2. PubMed ID: 22359818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A literature review of clinical efficiency, patient satisfaction, and future preference of Isolite and DryShield dental isolation systems among pediatric patients.
    Bagher SM; Sabbagh HJ
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Jul; 47(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 37408340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness evaluation of different suction systems.
    Junevicius J; Surna A; Surna R
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(2):52-7. PubMed ID: 16254467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization and mitigation of aerosols and spatters from ultrasonic scalers.
    Ou Q; Placucci RG; Danielson J; Anderson G; Olin P; Jardine P; Madden J; Yuan Q; Grafe TH; Shao S; Hong J; Pui DYH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Dec; 152(12):981-990. PubMed ID: 34538418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can extraoral suction units minimize droplet spatter during a simulated dental procedure?
    Chavis SE; Hines SE; Dyalram D; Wilken NC; Dalby RN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Feb; 152(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 33494869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency and patient satisfaction with the Isolite system versus rubber dam for sealant placement in pediatric patients.
    Alhareky MS; Mermelstein D; Finkelman M; Alhumaid J; Loo C
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(5):400-4. PubMed ID: 25303507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures.
    Bentley CD; Burkhart NW; Crawford JJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 May; 125(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8195499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A laboratory comparison of evacuation devices on aerosol reduction.
    Jacks ME
    J Dent Hyg; 2002; 76(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 12271865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of a preprocedural mouthrinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride in reducing bacteria in the dental office.
    Feres M; Figueiredo LC; Faveri M; Stewart B; de Vizio W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Apr; 141(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 20354090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of rubber dam in control of bacterial aerosols from high-speed handpieces.
    Hylin DL; Henry CA
    Tex Dent J; 1985 Mar; 102(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 3883563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.