These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23115827)
21. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [From crime to law. The decline of the legal protection of life]. Sánchez Cámara I Cuad Bioet; 2012; 23(77):25-36. PubMed ID: 22548655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Definition of intellectual disability in criminal court cases. Olley JG Intellect Dev Disabil; 2013 Apr; 51(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 23537359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A study of Spanish attitudes regarding the custody and use of forensic DNA databases. Gamero JJ; Romero JL; Peralta JL; Corte-Real F; Guillén M; Anjos MJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 19083809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Education and training for the judiciary: The Spanish initiative. Prieto L; Alonso A; Carracedo A Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102267. PubMed ID: 32199310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [The development of a test-system for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of DNA content in criminalistic objects by the real-time polymerase chain reaction]. Lapenkov MI; Plakhina NV; Alekseev IaI; Varlamov DA Sud Med Ekspert; 2011; 54(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 21735715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The United States Supreme Court and the chronic drunkenness offender. Driver RJ Q J Stud Alcohol; 1969 Mar; 30(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 5777166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Rulings in Argentinean and Colombian courts decriminalize possession of small amounts of narcotics. Cozac D HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2009 Dec; 14(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 20225523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Judicial intervention of the DNA test (comment on decisions of the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court No. 501/2005, of April 19, 2005, and No. 1311/2005, of October 14, 2005)]. Libano Beristain A Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2005; (23):193-207. PubMed ID: 16628880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comments on the review of low copy number testing. Gilder J; Koppl R; Kornfield I; Krane D; Mueller L; Thompson W Int J Legal Med; 2009 Nov; 123(6):535-6. PubMed ID: 18800222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. DNA evidence and miscarriages of justice. Gill P Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():e1-e3. PubMed ID: 30579629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Improved forensic DNA analysis through the use of alternative DNA polymerases and statistical modeling of DNA profiles. Hedman J; Nordgaard A; Rasmusson B; Ansell R; Rådström P Biotechniques; 2009 Nov; 47(5):951-8. PubMed ID: 20041848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minors need consent for abortion, Supreme Court rules. Ob Gyn News; 1979 Sep; 14(17):2+. PubMed ID: 11665034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Applications of DNA identification technology in protection of wild animals]. Ni PY; Pei L; Ge WD; Zhang Y; Yang XY; Xu XY; Tu Z Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 27(6):451-4, 459. PubMed ID: 22393598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection. Denniston L Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]