253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23116915)
1. Should participation in vaccine clinical trials be mandated?
Sheehy S; Meyer J
Virtual Mentor; 2012 Jan; 14(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 23116915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guinea pigs in the ER: researchers debate the ethics and logistics of performing emergency research without patients' consent.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2006 Jun; 52(41):A14-8. PubMed ID: 16856301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Restrict the Recruitment of Involuntarily Committed Patients for Psychiatric Research.
Elliott C; Lamkin M
JAMA Psychiatry; 2016 Apr; 73(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 26864804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research column: protection of children as subjects in research.
Nelson AE
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 2003; 20(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 12776262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research versus innovation: real differences.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human research protections: time for regulatory reform?
Maschke KJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 18457223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AIDS vaccine trials in India: ethical benchmarks and unanswered questions.
Jesani A; Coutinho L
Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 18630210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Coercion and the SATURN study.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 15035945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical experimentation concerning chemical and biological weapons for mass destruction.
Deutsch E
Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 34(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 16211734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research.
Shamoo AE; Schwartz J
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):3-5. PubMed ID: 19061094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research in children.
Burns JP
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S131-6. PubMed ID: 12626958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A quartet of criticisms.
Vanderpool HY
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16179299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Aspects of vulnerable patients and informed consent in clinical trials.
Kuthning M; Hundt F
Ger Med Sci; 2013; 11():Doc03. PubMed ID: 23346043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients?
Luce JM
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S153-60. PubMed ID: 12626961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [How to protect acutely ill, unconscious patients in connection with drug trials?].
Berg RM; Møller K; Rossel PJ
Ugeskr Laeger; 2011 Mar; 173(12):919. PubMed ID: 21539130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ending concerns about undue inducement.
Emanuel EJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15152431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
