These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23116957)

  • 1. Contraceptive justice: why we need a male pill.
    Campo-Engelstein L
    Virtual Mentor; 2012 Feb; 14(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 23116957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insurance: exclusion of contraception found discriminatory by EEOC.
    Netter W
    J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 11521259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The gender gap. Health care's next frontier.
    Ziegler J
    Bus Health; 1998 Nov; 16(11):29-34. PubMed ID: 10187549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The EPICC quest for prescription contraceptive insurance coverage.
    Vargas C
    Am J Law Med; 2002; 28(4):455-71. PubMed ID: 12516176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex discrimination or a hard pill for employers to swallow: examining the denial of contraceptive benefits in the wake of Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co.
    Korland L
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 2002; 53(2):531-67. PubMed ID: 16506335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prescription contraceptives: benefit whose time has come?
    Friedman MJ
    Manag Care; 2001 Oct; 10(10):62-3. PubMed ID: 11688113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facing reality: the Pregnancy Discrimination Act falls short for women undergoing infertility treatment.
    Cushing K
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2010; 40(4):1697-731. PubMed ID: 21280392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lack of insurance coverage for prescription contraception by an otherwise comprehensive plan as a violation of Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act--stretching the statute too far.
    Backmeyer ER
    Indiana Law Rev; 2004; 37(2):437-66. PubMed ID: 16211763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex discrimination and insurance for contraception.
    Law SA
    Wash Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 73(2):363-402. PubMed ID: 12465638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contraceptive use--United States and territories, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002.
    Bensyl DM; Iuliano DA; Carter M; Santelli J; Gilbert BC
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Nov; 54(6):1-72. PubMed ID: 16292246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The social meaning of the Norplant condition: constitutional considerations of race, class, and gender.
    Albiston C
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 1994; 9():9-57. PubMed ID: 16767841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marital status and female and male contraceptive sterilization in the United States.
    Eeckhaut MC
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1509-15. PubMed ID: 25881875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contraceptive availability to adolescents: do American values violate our most vulnerable?
    Elders MJ
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Dec; 84(6):741-5. PubMed ID: 18800038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [An idolized pill: a pill to be gilded...or resistance to oral contraception].
    Debout M
    Psychol Med (Paris); 1982 Jun; 14(8):1173-9. PubMed ID: 12268235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Backlash or equality?: The influence of men's and women's rights discourses on domestic violence legislation in Ontario.
    Girard AL
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Jan; 15(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 19015392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?
    Hammell H
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women of color and health: issues of gender, community, and power.
    Scales-Trent J
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 43(6):1357-68. PubMed ID: 10131161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ensuring equal medicine: a view from one woman in congress.
    Slaughter LM
    Internist; 1994 Feb; 35(2):11-3, 17. PubMed ID: 10132086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.