184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23117060)
1. Cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus test of cure after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: economic analysis from NHS Sentinel Sites Study.
Legood R; Smith M; Lew JB; Walker R; Moss S; Kitchener H; Patnick J; Canfell K
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e7086. PubMed ID: 23117060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surveillance after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness.
Melnikow J; Kulasingam S; Slee C; Helms LJ; Kuppermann M; Birch S; McGahan CE; Coldman A; Chan BK; Sawaya GF
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1158-70. PubMed ID: 20966702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Follow-up strategies after treatment (large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) test.
van der Heijden E; Lopes AD; Bryant A; Bekkers R; Galaal K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 1(1):CD010757. PubMed ID: 25562623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study.
Kocken M; Helmerhorst TJ; Berkhof J; Louwers JA; Nobbenhuis MA; Bais AG; Hogewoning CJ; Zaal A; Verheijen RH; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2011 May; 12(5):441-50. PubMed ID: 21530398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.
Rijkaart DC; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Bulkmans NW; Heideman DA; Kenter GG; Cuzick J; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 22177579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of commercial HPV assays in the context of post-treatment follow-up: Scottish Test of Cure Study (STOCS-H).
Cubie HA; Canham M; Moore C; Pedraza J; Graham C; Cuschieri K
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):458-63. PubMed ID: 24436334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ogilvie GS; van Niekerk D; Krajden M; Smith LW; Cook D; Gondara L; Ceballos K; Quinlan D; Lee M; Martin RE; Gentile L; Peacock S; Stuart GCE; Franco EL; Coldman AJ
JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29971397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ARTISTIC: a randomised trial of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in primary cervical screening.
Kitchener HC; Almonte M; Gilham C; Dowie R; Stoykova B; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J;
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(51):1-150, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19891902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reimbursed Costs of Management of Uterine Cervical Lesions in Poland--a Descriptive Analysis of Data from the National Health Fund and the Ministry of Health.
Nowakowski A; Śliwczyński A; Seroczyński P; Cybulski M; Teter Z
Cent Eur J Public Health; 2016 Jun; 24(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 27178030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection rates of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions within one screening round of primary human papillomavirus DNA testing: prospective randomised trial in Finland.
Leinonen MK; Nieminen P; Lönnberg S; Malila N; Hakama M; Pokhrel A; Laurila P; Tarkkanen J; Anttila A
BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e7789. PubMed ID: 23197596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk-adapted primary HPV cervical cancer screening project in Wolfsburg, Germany--experience over 3 years.
Luyten A; Scherbring S; Reinecke-Lüthge A; Braun BE; Pietralla M; Theiler K; Petry KU
J Clin Virol; 2009 Nov; 46 Suppl 3():S5-10. PubMed ID: 20129072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.
Felix JC; Lacey MJ; Miller JD; Lenhart GM; Spitzer M; Kulkarni R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jun; 25(6):606-16. PubMed ID: 27023044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
