These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23117096)

  • 1. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.
    Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forefoot angle at initial contact determines the amplitude of forefoot and rearfoot eversion during running.
    Monaghan GM; Hsu WH; Lewis CL; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Sep; 29(8):936-42. PubMed ID: 25001326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical measures of hip and foot-ankle mechanics as predictors of rearfoot motion and posture.
    Souza TR; Mancini MC; Araújo VL; Carvalhais VO; Ocarino JM; Silva PL; Fonseca ST
    Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 24268425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait of individuals with plantar fasciitis.
    Chang R; Rodrigues PA; Van Emmerik RE; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2571-7. PubMed ID: 24992816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foot pronation during walking is associated to the mechanical resistance of the midfoot joint complex.
    Gomes RBO; Souza TR; Paes BDC; Magalhães FA; Gontijo BA; Fonseca ST; Ocarino JM; Resende RA
    Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():20-23. PubMed ID: 30780086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.
    Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
    Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16759862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in Kinematic Coupling Among the Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Segments During Running and Walking.
    Takabayashi T; Edama M; Yokoyama E; Kanaya C; Inai T; Tokunaga Y; Kubo M
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 108(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29547030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking.
    Chang R; Van Emmerik R; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):3101-5. PubMed ID: 18778823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.
    Tome J; Nawoczenski DA; Flemister A; Houck J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2006 Sep; 36(9):635-44. PubMed ID: 17017268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forefoot midsole stiffness affects forefoot and rearfoot kinematics during the stance phase of gait.
    Resende RA; Fonseca ST; Silva PL; Pertence AE; Kirkwood RN
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24725040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of forefoot and arch posting orthotic designs on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics during gait.
    Nawoczenski DA; Ludewig PM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Jun; 34(6):317-27. PubMed ID: 15233393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fore- and rearfoot kinematics in high- and low-arched individuals during running.
    Barnes A; Wheat J; Milner CE
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Jul; 32(7):710-6. PubMed ID: 21972767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the rigidity and forefoot - Rearfoot kinematics from three forefoot tracking marker clusters during walking and weight-bearing foot pronation-supination.
    Magalhães FA; Souza TR; Araújo VL; Oliveira LM; Silveira LP; Ocarino JM; Fonseca ST
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109381. PubMed ID: 31676084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High heeled shoes: their effect on center of mass position, posture, three-dimensional kinematics, rearfoot motion, and ground reaction forces.
    Snow RE; Williams KR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 May; 75(5):568-76. PubMed ID: 8185452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthoses posted in both the forefoot and rearfoot reduce moments and angular impulses on lower extremity joints during walking.
    Hsu WH; Lewis CL; Monaghan GM; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2618-25. PubMed ID: 24968944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model.
    Levinger P; Murley GS; Barton CJ; Cotchett MP; McSweeney SR; Menz HB
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 20696579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width.
    Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Feb; 21(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 16269207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in foot and shank coupling due to alterations in foot strike pattern during running.
    Pohl MB; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 18006125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinematic adaptations of the hindfoot, forefoot, and hallux during cross-slope walking.
    Damavandi M; Dixon PC; Pearsall DJ
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jul; 32(3):411-5. PubMed ID: 20667737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.