These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23117166)

  • 1. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li N; Tan Y; Deng Y; Chen L
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Mar; 22(3):556-64. PubMed ID: 23117166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention versus Posterior Stabilization for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
    Jiang C; Liu Z; Wang Y; Bian Y; Feng B; Weng X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147865. PubMed ID: 26824368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis.
    Verra WC; van den Boom LG; Jacobs W; Clement DJ; Wymenga AA; Nelissen RG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD004803. PubMed ID: 24114343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses.
    Ishii Y; Noguchi H; Sato J; Sakurai T; Toyabe SI
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3536-3542. PubMed ID: 27485124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    van den Boom LG; Brouwer RW; van den Akker-Scheek I; Bulstra SK; van Raaij JJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Sep; 10():119. PubMed ID: 19793397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Total knee arthroplasty following failed high tibial osteotomy: mid-term comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized prosthesis.
    Akasaki Y; Matsuda S; Miura H; Okazaki K; Moro-oka TA; Mizu-uchi H; Iwamoto Y
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2009 Jul; 17(7):795-9. PubMed ID: 19357836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Cruciate-Sacrificing vs Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Replacement Using a Contemporary Total Knee System.
    Bernasek TL; Stoops TK; Gill M; Engel C; Simon P
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 34563437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluoroscopic and radiostereometric analysis of a bicruciate-retaining versus a posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mills K; Wymenga AB; Bénard MR; Kaptein BL; Defoort KC; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek PJC
    Bone Joint J; 2023 Jan; 105-B(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 36587259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Higher Frequency of Reoperation With a New Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Christensen JC; Brothers J; Stoddard GJ; Anderson MB; Pelt CE; Gililland JM; Peters CL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27043727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior Cruciate-Retaining vs Posterior Cruciate-Stabilized Prosthesis in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
    Lin J
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2023 Oct; 29(7):191-197. PubMed ID: 37499148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of clinical outcomes among total knee arthroplasties using posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, bi-cruciate substituting, bi-cruciate retaining designs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Sun K; Wu Y; Wu L; Shen B
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2023 Aug; 136(15):1817-1831. PubMed ID: 37365688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized designs on extensor mechanism function and knee function in patients after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A two-year retrospective follow-up study.
    Bakırhan S; Şahinoğlu E; Uysal E; Ünver B; Karatosun V
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 109(8):103701. PubMed ID: 37813332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No difference in patient-reported outcomes with cruciate-retaining, anterior-stabilized, and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty designs.
    Rehman Y; Korsvold AM; Lerdal A; Aamodt A
    Bone Joint J; 2023 Dec; 105-B(12):1271-1278. PubMed ID: 38037687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No Difference in Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
    van den Boom LGH; Brouwer RW; van den Akker-Scheek I; Reininga IHF; de Vries AJ; Bierma-Zeinstra SMA; van Raay JJAM
    J Knee Surg; 2020 Dec; 33(12):1243-1250. PubMed ID: 31284323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effectiveness comparison of partial versus intact posterior cruciate ligament-retaining in total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining prosthesis].
    Zhang B; Lin Y; Ren S; Chen T; Zhao X; Yu Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 35(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 33448199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No difference in range of motion between ultracongruent and posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lützner J; Beyer F; Dexel J; Fritzsche H; Lützner C; Kirschner S
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3515-3521. PubMed ID: 27659044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinctions of introarticular force distribution between genesis-II posterior stabilized and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: An intraoperative comparative study of 45 patients.
    Tang H; Chen H; Yang D; Jiang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Feb; 42():1-8. PubMed ID: 28042976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Better Flexion but Unaffected Satisfaction After Treatment With Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty - 2-year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial.
    Tille E; Beyer F; Lützner C; Postler A; Lützner J
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Feb; 39(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 37598783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-flexion posterior-substituting versus cruciate-retaining prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome, range of motion and complication comparison.
    Zhang Z; Zhu W; Zhang W
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 25388862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standard versus high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses.
    Li N; Li J; Li P; Wang D; Liu M; Xia L
    Orthopedics; 2015 Mar; 38(3):e206-12. PubMed ID: 25760508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.