These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23117317)
1. Prone position coronary angiography due to intractable back pain: another merit of transradial approach compared to transfemoral approach. Kwon SW; Cha JJ; Rhee JH J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Nov; 24(11):605-7. PubMed ID: 23117317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese. Hibbert B; Simard T; Wilson KR; Hawken S; Wells GA; Ramirez FD; Le May MR; So DY; Glover CA; Froeschl M; Marquis JF; Labinaz M; Dick A; O'Brien ER JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 5(8):819-26. PubMed ID: 22917453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy and safety of transradial approach in comparison with transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and ad hoc coronary angioplasty in Thailand. Sansanayudh N; Champasri K; Piamsomboon C; Sanguanwong S; Narksawasdee C; Tengtrakulcharoen P; Laotavorn P J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Nov; 93 Suppl 6():S145-51. PubMed ID: 21280527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transradial approach versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and coronary angioplasty. Mullin MK Crit Care Nurs Q; 2014; 37(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 24595253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiographic evaluation in patients with internal mammary artery grafts. Burzotta F; Trani C; Todaro D; Romagnoli E; Niccoli G; Ginnico F; Talarico GP; Tommasino A; Mazzari MA; Mongiardo R; Schiavoni G; Crea F J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Mar; 9(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 18301143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Patients. Pasley TF; Khan A; Yen LY; Newcombe R; Humphreys H; El-Jack S J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 28(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 26887028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach. Sanmartin M; Cuevas D; Moxica J; Valdes M; Esparza J; Baz JA; Mantilla R; Iñiguez A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Apr; 67(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 16547928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Our experience with transradial approach for coronary angiography. Vefali V; Arslan U Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Apr; 36(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 18626208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age. Achenbach S; Ropers D; Kallert L; Turan N; Krähner R; Wolf T; Garlichs C; Flachskampf F; Daniel WG; Ludwig J Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Nov; 72(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 18798237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for coronary bypass graft angiography and intervention. Han H; Zhou Y; Ma H; Liu Y; Shi D; Zhao Y; Yan Z; Gao F; Liu X; Yang S; Jia D; Shen H Angiology; 2012 Feb; 63(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 21571729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison between transradial approach and transferoral approach coronary angiography]. Hu XQ; Shen XQ; Zhou SH Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2005 Aug; 30(4):475-6. PubMed ID: 16190404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Transulnar artery approach for percutaneous coronary intervention: an alternative route in a patient with challenging transfemoral access and hypoplastic radial artery. Chiam PT; Lim VY Singapore Med J; 2010 May; 51(5):e81-4. PubMed ID: 20593134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate results of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: transradial versus transfemoral approach. Hsueh SK; Hsieh YK; Wu CJ; Fang CY; Youssef AA; Chen CJ; Chen SM; Yang CH; Yip HK; Chen MC; Fu M; Cheng CI Chang Gung Med J; 2008; 31(2):190-200. PubMed ID: 18567420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention. Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Kadota K; Iwabuchi M; Shizuta S; Shiomi H; Kimura T Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2012 May; 27(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 22623001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of routine transradial coronary angiography: a single operator's experience. Louvard Y; Krol M; Pezzano M; Sheers L; Piechaud JF; Marien C; Benaim R; Lardoux H; Morice MC J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 11(9):543-8. PubMed ID: 10745593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized comparison of transradial coronary angiography via right or left radial artery approaches. Kanei Y; Nakra NC; Liou M; Vales LL; Gowda R; Rosero H; Kwan T; Fox JT Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jan; 107(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 21129711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX). Sciahbasi A; Calabrò P; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Tomassini F; Sardella G; Zavalloni D; Cortese B; Limbruno U; Tebaldi M; Gagnor A; Rubartelli P; Zingarelli A; Valgimigli M Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 24746599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening of coronary artery anomalies in 11,707 patients reveals that the radial approach is safe for cannulating coronary anomalies. Özbek K; Katlandur H; Keser A; Ulucan Ş; Özdil H; Ülgen MS Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016; 20(6):1161-7. PubMed ID: 27049272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]