These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23118390)

  • 21. Femoral component loosening in high-flexion total knee replacement: an in vitro comparison of high-flexion versus conventional designs.
    Bollars P; Luyckx JP; Innocenti B; Labey L; Victor J; Bellemans J
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Oct; 93(10):1355-61. PubMed ID: 21969434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Failure of total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing.
    Lygre SH; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Vollset SE; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Jun; 82(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 21619502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.
    Wang C; Pfitzner T; von Roth P; Mayr HO; Sostheim M; Hube R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Oct; 24(10):3200-3211. PubMed ID: 26685696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Brown TE; Harper BL; Bjorgul K
    Orthopedics; 2013 May; 36(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 23672897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cementless reconstruction of massive tibial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Whiteside LA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):80-6. PubMed ID: 2805500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implant migration and failure in total knee arthroplasty is related to body mass index and tibial component size.
    Berend ME; Ritter MA; Hyldahl HC; Meding JB; Redelman R
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6 Suppl 1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18722310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Primary cementless total knee arthroplasty with or without stem extension: a matched comparative study of ninety eight standard stems versus ninety eight long stems after more than ten years of follow-up.
    Prudhon JL; Verdier R; Caton JH
    Int Orthop; 2019 Aug; 43(8):1849-1857. PubMed ID: 30284003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Matched-pair total knee arthroplasty retrieval analysis: oxidized zirconium vs. CoCrMo.
    Heyse TJ; Chen DX; Kelly N; Boettner F; Wright TM; Haas SB
    Knee; 2011 Dec; 18(6):448-52. PubMed ID: 20869251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early failure of cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibial components.
    Meneghini RM; de Beaubien BC
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1505-8. PubMed ID: 23561931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hybrid stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
    Chon JG; Lombardi AV; Berend KR
    Surg Technol Int; 2004; 12():214-20. PubMed ID: 15455329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Monoblock versus modular polyethylene insert in uncemented total knee arthroplasty.
    Andersen MR; Winther N; Lind T; SchrøDer H; Flivik G; Petersen MM
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):607-614. PubMed ID: 27649258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Five year survival analysis of an oxidised zirconium total knee arthroplasty.
    Holland P; Santini AJ; Davidson JS; Pope JA
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):384-7. PubMed ID: 23159720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cementing techniques for the tibial component in primary total knee replacement.
    Cawley DT; Kelly N; McGarry JP; Shannon FJ
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Mar; 95-B(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 23450010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tricon-M uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A review of 96 knees followed for longer than 2 years.
    Laskin RS
    J Arthroplasty; 1988; 3(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 3361318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tibial component fixation with a peri-apatite coating: evaluation by radiostereometric analysis in a canine total knee arthroplasty model.
    Allen MJ; Leone KA; Dunbar MJ; Race A; Rosenbaum PF; Sacks JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1138-48. PubMed ID: 22364907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
    Yu BF; Yang GJ; Wang WL; Zhang L; Lin XP
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Mar; 11():39. PubMed ID: 27030048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Micromotion secondary to axial, torsional, and shear loads in two models of cementless tibial components.
    Kraemer WJ; Harrington IJ; Hearn TC
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Apr; 10(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 7798106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hydroxyapatite-coated implants provide better fixation in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Horváth T; Hanák L; Hegyi P; Butt E; Solymár M; Szűcs Á; Varga O; Thien BQ; Szakács Z; Csonka E; Hartmann P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232378. PubMed ID: 32396538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry.
    Nilsson KG; Kärrholm J; Carlsson L; Dalén T
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Jan; 14(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 9926947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.