253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23119105)
1. Accuracy of grading of urothelial carcinoma on urine cytology: an analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
Reid MD; Osunkoya AO; Siddiqui MT; Looney SW
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2012; 5(9):882-91. PubMed ID: 23119105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urinary tract cytology: a cytologic-histopathologic correlation with The Paris System, an institutional study.
Danakas A; Sweeney M; Cheris S; Agrawal T
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 33132054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urinary cytology with acridine orange fluorescence is highly valuable for predicting high-grade upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Li J; Zhang Z; Wang J; Zhang C; Li H; Xu Y
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(2):774-8. PubMed ID: 24551302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Paris System "atypical urothelial cells" category: can the current criteria be improved?
Vosoughi A; Ordobazari A; Lora Gonzalez MA; Guido LP; Skiba M; Campuzano-Zuluaga G; Kryvenko ON; Gomez-Fernandez C; Garcia-Buitrago M; Jorda M
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 32732113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Targeted education as a method for reinforcing Paris System criteria and reducing urine cytology atypia rates.
Compton ML; Weiss VL; Barkan GA; Ely KA
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 32771394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying the Paris system for reporting urine cytology to challenging cytology cases.
Glass R; Rosca O; Raab S; Szabelska J; Chau K; Sheikh-Fayyaz S; Cocker R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jul; 47(7):675-681. PubMed ID: 31017746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver reproducibility of The Paris System of Reporting Urine Cytology on cytocentrifuged samples.
Sahai R; Rajkumar B; Joshi P; Singh A; Kumar A; Durgapal P; Gupta A; Kishore S; Chowdhury N
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Nov; 48(11):979-985. PubMed ID: 32543091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of urinary cytology in the diagnosis of high grade urothelial tumors].
Niedworok C; Rembrink V; Hakenberg OW; Börgermann C; Rossi R; Schneider T; Becker M; Szarvas T; von Ostau C; Swoboda A; Rübben H; vom Dorp F
Urologe A; 2009 Sep; 48(9):1018, 1020-2, 1024. PubMed ID: 19697005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new 7-point method facilitates accurate diagnosis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma in routine urinary cytology practice.
Iwai S; Mimura A; Ohtani H; Shimokama T; Kinjo M
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):103-109. PubMed ID: 33092994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing a Machine Learning Algorithm for Identifying Abnormal Urothelial Cells: A Feasibility Study.
Zhang Z; Fu X; Liu J; Huang Z; Liu N; Fang F; Rao J
Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(4):335-341. PubMed ID: 33022673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based diagnostic accuracy measurement in urine cytology using likelihood ratios.
Myles N; Auger M; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Kassouf W; Brimo F
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 33071190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureterorenoscopic biopsy and urinary cytology according to the 2004 WHO classification underestimate tumor grading in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Straub J; Strittmatter F; Karl A; Stief CG; Tritschler S
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1166-70. PubMed ID: 22300757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology reduces atypia rates and does not alter the negative predictive value of urine cytology.
McIntire PJ; Kilic I; Pambuccian SE; Wojcik EM; Barkan GA
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 33221245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-grade urothelial carcinoma with hypochromatic chromatin in urine cytology.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):25-28. PubMed ID: 33132055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An institutional experience evaluating hTERT immunostaining in 100 consecutive ThinPrep urine specimens.
Xing J; Han M; Monaco SE; Dhir R; Roy S; Pantanowitz L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 32354607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Causes of false-negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology.
Lee PJ; Owens CL; Lithgow MY; Jiang Z; Fischer AH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Dec; 44(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 27781412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Urinary cytology for the detection of urothelial lesions].
Duchêne L; Davenne É; Lifrange F; Detrembleur N; Delporte G; Waltregny D; Delvenne P
Rev Med Liege; 2024 Jun; 79(5-6):424-428. PubMed ID: 38869134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome analysis and negative predictive value of the "unsatisfactory/nondiagnostic" category of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Abro S; Nomani L; Wojcik EM; Pambuccian SE; Chatt G; Barkan GA
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 33279453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology: different spaces - different faces, highlighting morphologic variance.
McIntire PJ; Elsoukkary SS; Robinson BD; Siddiqui MT
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 32958411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience on the use of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology: review of the published literature.
Pastorello RG; Barkan GA; Saieg M
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 33160893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
