These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23121577)

  • 21. Screening mammography.
    McRae S
    Can J Rural Med; 2010; 15(4):167; author reply 168. PubMed ID: 20875318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modelling the cumulative risk for a false-positive under repeated screening events.
    Gelfand AE; Wang F
    Stat Med; 2000 Jul; 19(14):1865-79. PubMed ID: 10867676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Screening mammography and public health policy: the need for perspective.
    Wright CJ; Mueller CB
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8966):29-32. PubMed ID: 7603143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features.
    Castells X; Torá-Rocamora I; Posso M; Román M; Vernet-Tomas M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Domingo L; Vidal C; Baré M; Ferrer J; Quintana MJ; Sánchez M; Natal C; Espinàs JA; Saladié F; Sala M;
    Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 26878225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast cancer screening: one life saved at a cost of three overdiagnosis.
    BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e7460. PubMed ID: 23129492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risks of false-positive breast cancer screening results.
    Levine D; French L
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 9673600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. More older women getting mammograms.
    Cockey CD
    AWHONN Lifelines; 2000; 4(5):18. PubMed ID: 11898154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mammography Clinical Image Quality and the False Positive Rate in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HTV; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 May; 69(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 29706254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17626709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer.
    Lampic C; Thurfjell E; Sjödén PO
    Eur J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 39(12):1730-7. PubMed ID: 12888368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes.
    Salz T; Richman AR; Brewer NT
    Psychooncology; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1026-34. PubMed ID: 20882572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early outcome of mammography screening in Copenhagen 1991-99.
    Vejborg I; Olsen AH; Jensen MB; Rank F; Tange UB; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12370322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.
    Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Bird RE; Desrochers DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 11517043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Information on mammography screening--from deception to insight].
    Mühlhauser I; Höldke B
    Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 12063738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictors of mammography screening among Iranian women attending outpatient clinics in Tehran, Iran.
    Ahmadian M; Samah AA; Redzuan M; Emby Z
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(3):969-74. PubMed ID: 22631681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography.
    Schell MJ; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Qaqish BF; Barlow WE; Rosenberg RD; Smith-Bindman R
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):681-9. PubMed ID: 17517927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening and diagnostic mammograms: why the gold standard does not shine more brightly.
    Sobti A; Sobti P; Keith LG
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2005; 50(5 Pt 1):199-206. PubMed ID: 16468469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trends in mammography utilization, 1981 to 1994.
    Gaudette LA; Altmayer CA; Nobrega KM; Lee J
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(3):17-27(Eng); 19-30(Fre). PubMed ID: 9085118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of the Introduction of Digital Mammography in an Organized Screening Program on the Recall and Detection Rate.
    Campari C; Giorgi Rossi P; Mori CA; Ravaioli S; Nitrosi A; Vacondio R; Mancuso P; Cattani A; Pattacini P
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Apr; 29(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 26537932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.