130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23121888)
1. Accuracy of the point-of-care coagulometer CoaguChek XS in the hands of patients.
Nagler M; Raddatz-Müller P; Schmid P; Bachmann LM; Wuillemin WA
J Thromb Haemost; 2013 Jan; 11(1):197-9. PubMed ID: 23121888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Acceptability of CoaguChek S and CoaguChek XS generated international normalised ratios against a laboratory standard in a paediatric setting.
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V
Pathology; 2008 Jun; 40(4):437-8; author reply 438-9. PubMed ID: 18446645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Acceptability of CoaguChek S and CoaguChek XS generated international normalised ratios against a laboratory standard in a paediatric setting.
Williams VK; Griffiths AB
Pathology; 2007 Dec; 39(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 18027261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and clinical utility of the CoaguChek XS portable international normalised ratio monitor in a pilot study of warfarin home-monitoring.
Bereznicki LR; Jackson SL; Peterson GM; Jeffrey EC; Marsden KA; Jupe DM
J Clin Pathol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 16751303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the CoaguChek XS Plus system in a Swiss community setting.
Deom A; Reber G; Tsakiris DA; Hannes FM; Plesch W
Thromb Haemost; 2009 May; 101(5):988-90. PubMed ID: 19404558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.
Bauman ME; Black KL; Massicotte MP; Bauman ML; Kuhle S; Howlett-Clyne S; Cembrowski GS; Bajzar L
Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jun; 99(6):1097-103. PubMed ID: 18521514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of accuracy and clinical agreement of the CoaguChek XS portable device versus standard laboratory practice in unexperienced patients.
Torreiro EG; Fernández EG; Rodríguez RM; López CV; Núñez JB
Thromb Haemost; 2009 May; 101(5):969-74. PubMed ID: 19404552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International normalised ratio (INR) measured on the CoaguChek S and XS compared with the laboratory for determination of precision and accuracy.
Christensen TD; Larsen TB; Jensen C; Maegaard M; Sørensen B
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Mar; 101(3):563-9. PubMed ID: 19277421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-control of long-term oral anticoagulation using a point-of-care device.
Roudaut R
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2008; 101(11-12):683-4. PubMed ID: 19059561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision and accuracy of point-of-care testing coagulometers used for self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy.
Christensen TD; Larsen TB
J Thromb Haemost; 2012 Feb; 10(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 22118602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is patient self-testing a good thing?
Oertel LB; Libby EN
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2010 Feb; 29(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 19902148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.
Wieloch M; Hillarp A; Strandberg K; Nilsson C; Svensson PJ
Thromb Res; 2009 Jul; 124(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19423152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-of-care analyzers.
Karon BS; McBane RD; Chaudhry R; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jul; 130(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18550476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management.
Braun S; Watzke H; Hasenkam JM; Schwab M; Wolf T; Dovifat C; Völler H
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb; 97(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 17264962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized trial comparing INR monitoring devices in patients with anticoagulation self-management: evaluation of a novel error-grid approach.
Hemkens LG; Hilden KM; Hartschen S; Kaiser T; Didjurgeit U; Hansen R; Bender R; Sawicki PT
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2008 Aug; 26(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 17965836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the INR Values Measured by CoaguChek XS Coagulometer and Conventional Laboratory Methods in Patients on VKA Therapy.
Kalçık M; Yesin M; Gürsoy MO; Gündüz S; Karakoyun S; Astarcıoğlu MA; Bayam E; Cerşit S; Özkan M
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2017 Mar; 23(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 26177662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International normalized ratio testing with point-of-care coagulometer in healthy term neonates.
Iijima S; Baba T; Ueno D; Ohishi A
BMC Pediatr; 2014 Jul; 14():179. PubMed ID: 25008798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precision and accuracy of CoaguChek S and XS monitors: the need for external quality assessment.
Poller L
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Mar; 101(3):419-21. PubMed ID: 19277400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
