These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23122570)

  • 1. Multi-reader ROC studies with split-plot designs: a comparison of statistical methods.
    Obuchowski NA; Gallas BD; Hillis SL
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1508-17. PubMed ID: 23122570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation of unequal-variance binormal multireader ROC decision data: an extension of the Roe and Metz simulation model.
    Hillis SL
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1518-28. PubMed ID: 23122571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between Roe and Metz simulation model for multireader diagnostic data and Obuchowski-Rockette model parameters.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(13):2067-2093. PubMed ID: 29609206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):709-16. PubMed ID: 9419629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis: an empirical comparison of five methods.
    Obuchowski NA; Beiden SV; Berbaum KS; Hillis SL; Ishwaran H; Song HH; Wagner RF
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):980-95. PubMed ID: 15350579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Roe and Metz identical-test simulation model for validating multi-reader methods of analysis for comparing different radiologic imaging modalities.
    Hillis SL
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 1):S11916. PubMed ID: 37416057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paired split-plot designs of multireader multicase studies.
    Chen W; Gong Q; Gallas BD
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Jul; 5(3):031410. PubMed ID: 29795776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identical-test Roe and Metz simulation model for validating multi-reader methods of analysis for comparing different radiologic imaging modalities.
    Hillis SL
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2022; 12035():. PubMed ID: 36159879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A marginal-mean ANOVA approach for analyzing multireader multicase radiological imaging data.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(2):330-60. PubMed ID: 24038071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power estimation for multireader ROC methods an updated and unified approach.
    Hillis SL; Obuchowski NA; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 21232681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 19124107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous inference for factorial multireader diagnostic trials.
    Konietschke F; Aguayo RR; Staab W
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):28-47. PubMed ID: 28980323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hypothesis testing in noninferiority and equivalence MRMC ROC studies.
    Chen W; Petrick NA; Sahiner B
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):1158-65. PubMed ID: 22717591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Lenth RV; Chen YF; Donaghy BA
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):591-602. PubMed ID: 9750888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical power considerations for a utility endpoint in observer performance studies.
    Abbey CK; Samuelson FW; Gallas BD
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):798-806. PubMed ID: 23611439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction accuracy of a sample-size estimation method for ROC studies.
    Chakraborty DP
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):628-38. PubMed ID: 20380980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(3):596-619. PubMed ID: 16538699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
    Hillis SL; Obuchowski NA; Schartz KM; Berbaum KS
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1579-607. PubMed ID: 15685718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.
    Kim E; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25355470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.