101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2312263)
1. Just what does Webster mean?
Crigger BJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 2312263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Webster versus reproductive health services.
Rhodes AM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
Segers MC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Webster and the politics of abortion.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: do legislative declarations that life begins at conception violate the establishment clause?
Maddox RL; Bortnick B
Campbell Law Rev; 1989; 12(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11656028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment.
Westfall D
Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Introduction: did the amici effort make a difference?
Kolbert K
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):153-68. PubMed ID: 2603857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
Crain CA
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
Glendon MA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Court edges away from Roe v. Wade.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 2792338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions.
Orentlicher D
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
Parness JA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
Rubenfeld J
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion on demand.
Rovinsky JJ
Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 6608671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note.
Glenn HP
McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
