These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2312263)

  • 21. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework.
    Mangel CP
    Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
    Morgan RG
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
    Blaustein AP
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gestational burdens and fetal status: justifying Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA
    Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):189-212. PubMed ID: 3333215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When does personhood begin?
    Donovan P
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 6680701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Supreme Court's ruling in the Webster case: implications for Georgia physicians.
    Harris AL
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1989 Sep; 78(9):633-6. PubMed ID: 2778409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abortion: is there a rational precept?
    Reiter RC; Johnson SR; Beller FK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):464-7. PubMed ID: 1876385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
    Martyn K
    UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women.
    Curran WJ
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1983; 61(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 6343918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Abortion--the breath of life.
    Joling RJ
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; 21(2):199-232. PubMed ID: 4613988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
    Rice CE
    Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Witherspoon JS
    St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn.
    King PA
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence.
    Bopp J; Cook CR
    Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 9707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
    Parness JA; Pritchard SK
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
    Tribe LH
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The fetus as a patient: emerging rights as a person?
    Lenow JL
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 6638018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.