These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2312263)
21. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework. Mangel CP Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law. Morgan RG Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants. Blaustein AP Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Gestational burdens and fetal status: justifying Roe v. Wade. Robertson JA Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):189-212. PubMed ID: 3333215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. When does personhood begin? Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 6680701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Supreme Court's ruling in the Webster case: implications for Georgia physicians. Harris AL J Med Assoc Ga; 1989 Sep; 78(9):633-6. PubMed ID: 2778409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Abortion: is there a rational precept? Reiter RC; Johnson SR; Beller FK Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):464-7. PubMed ID: 1876385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law. Martyn K UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women. Curran WJ Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1983; 61(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 6343918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion--the breath of life. Joling RJ Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; 21(2):199-232. PubMed ID: 4613988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments. Rice CE Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment. Witherspoon JS St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn. King PA Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence. Bopp J; Cook CR Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 9707939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]