These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2312271)
21. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights. Suhr JN Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients. Gottlich V Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly. Glover JJ J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 2110203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective. McNoble DJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy. Lyon EA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan. Weir RF; Gostin L JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy. Kamisar Y Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case. Obade CC J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case. Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The ethics of Cruzan. Families, not states, should make treatment termination decisions. Brodeur D Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):42-7. PubMed ID: 10107438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What does Cruzan mean to the practicing physician? White BD; Siegler M; Singer PA; Iserson KV Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 2025139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Constitutionalizing the "right to die". Mayo TW MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The right of the dying to refuse life prolonging medical procedures: the evolving importance of state constitutions. Marks TC; Morgan RC Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1992; 18(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 11654441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle? Byrnes JC Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Cruzan after Dobbs: What Remains of the Constitutional Right to Refuse Treatment? Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 2023 Mar; 53(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 37092653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die. Berman MB Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]