These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23122924)
1. Parental evaluation of postoperative outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection by dorsal slit technique: a randomized controlled trial. Nagdeve NG; Naik H; Bhingare PD; Morey SM J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Oct; 9(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 23122924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized trial comparing dissection with Plastibell® circumcision. Bastos Netto JM; de Araújo JG; de Almeida Noronha MF; Passos BR; de Bessa J; Figueiredo AA J Pediatr Urol; 2010 Dec; 6(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 20153700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to a conventional dissection technique. Fraser IA; Allen MJ; Bagshaw PF; Johnstone M Br J Surg; 1981 Aug; 68(8):593-5. PubMed ID: 7023597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children. Bastos Netto JM; Gonçalves de Araújo J; Noronha MF; Passos BR; Lopes HE; Bessa Jd; Figueiredo AA Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 24054384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten years experience with a novel modification of plastibell circumcision. Hammed A; Helal AA; Badway R; Goda SH; Yehya A; Razik MA; Elshamy A; Elsamahy O Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2014; 11(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 24841023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of pain and hemodynamic response in older children undergoing circumcision: comparison of eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream and dorsal penile nerve block. Salgado Filho MF; Gonçalves HB; Pimentel Filho LH; Rodrigues Dda S; da Silva IP; Avarese de Figueiredo A; Bastos Netto JM J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Oct; 9(5):638-42. PubMed ID: 22897985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Circumcision with a novel disposable device in Chinese children: a randomized controlled trial. Pan F; Pan L; Zhang A; Liu Y; Zhang F; Dai Y Int J Urol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 22974480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pain during Mogen or PlastiBell circumcision. Taeusch HW; Martinez AM; Partridge JC; Sniderman S; Armstrong-Wells J; Fuentes-Afflick E J Perinatol; 2002; 22(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 11948384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of two surgical circumcision procedures on postoperative pain: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Karakoyunlu N; Polat R; Aydin GB; Ergil J; Akkaya T; Ersoy H J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):124.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25842991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized controlled trial measuring satisfaction and parents stress after Gomco and Plastibell infant circumcision. Alsowayan OS; Al Zahrani AM; Basalelah JH; Al Madi MK; Al Humam AA; Al Otaibi AN; AlKhamis AA; Fadaak KH; Al Suhaibani SS; El Darawany HM Pediatr Surg Int; 2024 Feb; 40(1):51. PubMed ID: 38324024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Plastibell circumcision: a minor surgical procedure of major importance. Samad A; Khanzada TW; Kumar B J Pediatr Urol; 2010 Feb; 6(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19525148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circumcision with the Plastibell device. A long-term follow-up. Sörensen SM; Sörensen MR Int Urol Nephrol; 1988; 20(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3384610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parental circumcision preferences and early outcome of plastibell circumcision in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Ekwunife OH; Ugwu JO; Okoli CC; Modekwe VI; Osuigwe AN Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2015; 12(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 26712290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Plastibell circumcision of 2,276 male infants: a multi-centre study. Jimoh BM; Odunayo IS; Chinwe I; Akinfolarin OO; Oluwafemi A; Olusanmi EJ Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 23():35. PubMed ID: 27200140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Circumcision in paediatric surgery using an ultrasound dissection scalpel. Fette A; Schleef J; Haberlik A; Seebacher U Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 10942993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plastibell Device Circumcision versus Bone Cutter Technique in terms of Operative Outcomes and Parent's Satisfaction. Mehmood T; Azam H; Tariq M; Iqbal Z; Mehmood H; Shah SA Pak J Med Sci; 2016; 32(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 27182237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomised comparison of bipolar diathermy versus conventional dorsal slit technique for ritual circumcision: a Malaysian experience. Fariz MM; Tarmizi MN; Ainaini MH; Khairil AM; Faizal A; Sagap I Clin Ter; 2011; 162(6):543-5. PubMed ID: 22262325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of complications of circumcision by 'Plastibell device technique' in male neonates and infants. Moosa FA; Khan FW; Rao MH J Pak Med Assoc; 2010 Aug; 60(8):664-7. PubMed ID: 20726200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neonatal plastibell circumcision: does the thread type matter? a prospective randomized study. Altokhais T; Elsarrag A; Khan S; Alshehri A; Albassam A J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Oct; 15(5):562.e1-562.e5. PubMed ID: 31563548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]