BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23123312)

  • 1. Assessing the containment efficiency of a microbiological safety cabinet during the simultaneous generation of a nanoaerosol and a tracer gas.
    Cesard V; Belut E; Prevost C; Taniere A; Rimbert N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Apr; 57(3):345-59. PubMed ID: 23123312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flow and performance of an air-curtain biological safety cabinet.
    Huang RF; Chou CI
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jun; 53(4):425-40. PubMed ID: 19398506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluid dynamics of cytotoxic safety cabinets.
    Braconnier R; Bonthoux F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 20007340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vortex ventilation in the laboratory environment.
    Meisenzahl LR
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(10):672-9. PubMed ID: 25175282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of leakage from a metal machining center using tracer gas methods: a case study.
    Heitbrink WA; Earnest GS; Mickelsen RL; Mead KR; D'Arcy JB
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):785-8. PubMed ID: 10635544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of leakage from fume hoods using tracer gas, tracer nanoparticles and nanopowder handling test methodologies.
    Dunn KH; Tsai CS; Woskie SR; Bennett JS; Garcia A; Ellenbecker MJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(10):D164-73. PubMed ID: 25175285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of the reverse flow around a worker's body produced by a local exhaust hood].
    Ojima J
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2003 Jul; 45(4):125-32. PubMed ID: 12968498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the operator protection factors offered by positive pressure air suits against airborne microbiological challenge.
    Steward JA; Lever MS
    Viruses; 2012 Aug; 4(8):1202-11. PubMed ID: 23012620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Airborne contaminant exposure control in a partitioned work environment by exhaust ventilation systems.
    Chung KC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 May; 59(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 9858976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupational exposure to hazardous airborne pollutants: effects of air mixing and source location.
    Rim D; Novoselac A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Dec; 7(12):683-92. PubMed ID: 20981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International Society for Analytical Cytology biosafety standard for sorting of unfixed cells.
    Schmid I; Lambert C; Ambrozak D; Marti GE; Moss DM; Perfetto SP;
    Cytometry A; 2007 Jun; 71(6):414-37. PubMed ID: 17385740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of ionic air purifiers for reducing aerosol exposure in confined indoor spaces.
    Grinshpun SA; Mainelis G; Trunov M; Adhikari A; Reponen T; Willeke K
    Indoor Air; 2005 Aug; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 15982270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flow and containment characteristics of a sash-less, variable-height inclined air-curtain fume hood.
    Huang RF; Chen JK; Hung WL
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Aug; 57(7):934-52. PubMed ID: 23519947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the biosafety of cell sorting by adaptation of a cell sorting system to a biosafety cabinet.
    Lennartz K; Lu M; Flasshove M; Moritz T; Kirstein U
    Cytometry A; 2005 Aug; 66(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 15973698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Containment testing of isolation rooms.
    Rydock JP; Eian PK
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Jul; 57(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 15236852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of sash movement and walk-bys on aerodynamics and contaminant leakage of laboratory fume cupboards.
    Tseng LC; Huang RF; Chen CC; Chang CP
    Ind Health; 2007 Apr; 45(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 17485863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between tracer gas and aerosol particles distribution indoors: The impact of ventilation rate, interaction of airflows, and presence of objects.
    Bivolarova M; Ondráček J; Melikov A; Ždímal V
    Indoor Air; 2017 Nov; 27(6):1201-1212. PubMed ID: 28378912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Airborne nanoparticle exposures while using constant-flow, constant-velocity, and air-curtain-isolated fume hoods.
    Tsai SJ; Huang RF; Ellenbecker MJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jan; 54(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 19933309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting gaseous pollutant dispersion around a workplace.
    Guerra D; Ricciardi L; Laborde JC; Domenech S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Aug; 4(8):619-33. PubMed ID: 17577751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a tractor cab using real-time aerosol counting instrumentation.
    Hall RM; Heitbrink WA; Reed LD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Jan; 17(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11800406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.