37 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23123601)
1. Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems.
Marshall NW; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7629-50. PubMed ID: 23123601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Full 3-D modulation transfer function estimation of tomosynthesis system using modified Richardson-Lucy deconvolution.
Song H; Lee C; Baek J
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2510-2525. PubMed ID: 38011539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modulation transfer function of digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of various edge devices.
Shirato T; Doryo K; Yamada S; Ozaki Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38780698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A statistical, task-based evaluation method for three-dimensional x-ray breast imaging systems using variable-background phantoms.
Park S; Jennings R; Liu H; Badano A; Myers K
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6253-70. PubMed ID: 21302782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposing a New Velocity Profile for Continuous X-Ray Tube Motion in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Bakic PR; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2013 Feb; 8668():. PubMed ID: 38800605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterizing the MTF in 3D for a Quantized SPECT Camera Having Arbitrary Trajectories.
Madhav P; Bowsher JE; Cutler SJ; Tornai MP
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2009 Jun; 56(3):661-670. PubMed ID: 21331301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of beam quality and readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of photostimulable phosphor systems via the edge method.
Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Tsuru H; Tatsumi M; Kato T; Okamura K; Yoshiura K
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2021 Jul; 8(4):043501. PubMed ID: 34307736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of Deconvolution Method with Adaptive Point Spread Function Based on Scintillator Thickness in Wavelet Domain.
Kim K; Cha BK; Jeong HW; Lee Y
Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 38671752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three dimensions, two microscopes, one code: Automatic differentiation for x-ray nanotomography beyond the depth of focus limit.
Du M; Nashed YSG; Kandel S; Gürsoy D; Jacobsen C
Sci Adv; 2020 Mar; 6(13):eaay3700. PubMed ID: 32258397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The emerging role of breast tomosynthesis.
Uematsu T
Breast Cancer; 2013 Jul; 20(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 23456738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of multi-directional MTF for breast tomosynthesis.
Samei E; Murphy S; Richard S
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 58(5):1649-61. PubMed ID: 23422248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. X-ray source motion blur modeling and deblurring with generative diffusion for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38640913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimized signal of calcifications in wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis: a virtual imaging trial.
Vancoillie L; Cockmartin L; Lueck F; Marshall N; Keupers M; Nanke R; Kappler S; Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H
Eur Radiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38546790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visualizing microcalcifications in lumpectomy specimens: an exploration into the clinical potential of carbon nanotube-enabled
Puett C; Gao J; Tucker A; Inscoe CR; Hwang M; Kuzmiak CM; Lu J; Zhou O; Lee YZ
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2019 Jul; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 33304617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical evaluation of image quality in synthetic mammograms obtained from 15° and 40° digital breast tomosynthesis in a commercial system: a quantitative comparison.
Barca P; Lamastra R; Tucciariello RM; Traino A; Marini C; Aringhieri G; Caramella D; Fantacci ME
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 44(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 33226534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Verification of the accuracy of a hybrid breast imaging simulation framework for virtual clinical trial applications.
Vancoillie L; Marshall N; Cockmartin L; Vignero J; Zhang G; Bosmans H
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 Jul; 7(4):042804. PubMed ID: 32341939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Human observer performance on in-plane digital breast tomosynthesis images: Effects of reconstruction filters and data acquisition angles on signal detection.
Lee C; Han M; Baek J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229915. PubMed ID: 32163472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional segmentation of breast masses from digital breast tomosynthesis images.
Pöhlmann STL; Lim YY; Harkness E; Pritchard S; Taylor CJ; Astley SM
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Jul; 4(3):034007. PubMed ID: 28948195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
