These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2312416)

  • 1. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects.
    Collet L; Kemp DT; Veuillet E; Duclaux R; Moulin A; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):251-61. PubMed ID: 2312416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
    Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evoked otoacoustic emissions and their modification by contralateral acoustic stimulation].
    Plinkert PK; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Feb; 71(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 1571058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of auditory stimulation and visual attention on otoacoustic emissions.
    Ferber-Viart C; Duclaux R; Collet L; Guyonnard F
    Physiol Behav; 1995 Jun; 57(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 7652027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    van Zyl A; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19401226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Middle ear muscle and medial olivocochlear activity inferred from individual human ears via cochlear potentials.
    Jennings SG; Aviles ES
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Mar; 153(3):1723. PubMed ID: 37002081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear Nerve Aplasia with Detectable Olivocochlear Efferent Function: A Distinct Presentation of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    James AL; Dixon PR; Harrison RV
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 29936500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex inhibition of human cochlear nerve responses.
    Lichtenhan JT; Wilson US; Hancock KE; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():216-224. PubMed ID: 26364824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
    Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.