These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23126611)

  • 41. Do unto others as they do unto you: reciprocity and social identification as determinants of ingroup favoritism.
    Stroebe K; Lodewijkx HF; Spears R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jun; 31(6):831-45. PubMed ID: 15833909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Two ways to overcome the three social dilemmas of indirect reciprocity.
    Okada I
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16799. PubMed ID: 33033279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. When do stereotypes undermine indirect reciprocity?
    Kawakatsu M; Michel-Mata S; Kessinger TA; Tarnita CE; Plotkin JB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 Mar; 20(3):e1011862. PubMed ID: 38427626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Investigating the Evolution of Ingroup Favoritism Using a Minimal Group Interaction Paradigm: The Effects of Inter- and Intragroup Interdependence.
    Durrheim K; Quayle M; Tredoux CG; Titlestad K; Tooke L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165974. PubMed ID: 27851791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Indirect reciprocity with abductive reasoning.
    Pandula N; Akçay E; Morsky B
    J Theor Biol; 2024 Mar; 580():111715. PubMed ID: 38154522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Expectation of others' reward allocation, and ingroup favoritism in reward allocation].
    Tajima T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1997 Jun; 68(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 9278966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Value homophily benefits cooperation but motivates employing incorrect social information.
    Rauwolf P; Mitchell D; Bryson JJ
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Feb; 367():246-261. PubMed ID: 25481838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A second-order stability analysis for the continuous model of indirect reciprocity.
    Lee S; Murase Y; Baek SK
    J Theor Biol; 2022 Sep; 548():111202. PubMed ID: 35752284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Three-person game facilitates indirect reciprocity under image scoring.
    Suzuki S; Akiyama E
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 17714735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The competition of assessment rules for indirect reciprocity.
    Uchida S; Sigmund K
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19962390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Opposing Oxytocin Effects on Intergroup Cooperative Behavior in Intuitive and Reflective Minds.
    Ma Y; Liu Y; Rand DG; Heatherton TF; Han S
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2015 Sep; 40(10):2379-87. PubMed ID: 25807529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem.
    Panchanathan K; Boyd R
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):499-502. PubMed ID: 15565153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ingroup favoritism overrides fairness when resources are limited.
    Chae J; Kim K; Kim Y; Lim G; Kim D; Kim H
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4560. PubMed ID: 35296722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A mechanistic model of gossip, reputations, and cooperation.
    Kawakatsu M; Kessinger TA; Plotkin JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(20):e2400689121. PubMed ID: 38717858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Two wrongs don't make a right: the initial viability of different assessment rules in the evolution of indirect reciprocity.
    Panchanathan K
    J Theor Biol; 2011 May; 277(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 21329700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quantitative assessment can stabilize indirect reciprocity under imperfect information.
    Schmid L; Ekbatani F; Hilbe C; Chatterjee K
    Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):2086. PubMed ID: 37045828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The sense of belonging reduces ingroup favoritism in children.
    Park JH; Jin KS
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1059415. PubMed ID: 36532981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cooperative behaviour and prosocial reputation dynamics in a Dominican village.
    Macfarlan SJ; Quinlan R; Remiker M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jun; 280(1761):20130557. PubMed ID: 23760642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reputation and the evolution of cooperation in sizable groups.
    Suzuki S; Akiyama E
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 272(1570):1373-7. PubMed ID: 16006331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Destructive Effect of Ingroup Competition on Ingroup Favoritism.
    Zuo Y; Chen B; Zhao Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2207. PubMed ID: 30532715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.