134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127052)
1. Technical note: precision and accuracy of a commercially available CT optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry system for the measurement of CT dose index.
Vrieze TJ; Sturchio GM; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6580-4. PubMed ID: 23127052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of multislice computed tomography dose index (CTDI) using optically stimulated luminescence technology.
Ruan C; Yukihara EG; Clouse WJ; Gasparian PB; Ahmad S
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3560-8. PubMed ID: 20831063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of a commercially-available, optically-stimulated luminescent dosimetry system for use in computed tomography.
Lavoie L; Ghita M; Brateman L; Arreola M
Health Phys; 2011 Sep; 101(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 21799346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) technique for mouse dosimetry in micro-CT imaging.
Vrigneaud JM; Courteau A; Ranouil J; Morgand L; Raguin O; Walker P; Oudot A; Collin B; Brunotte F
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122102. PubMed ID: 24320529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical Note: Using linear and polynomial approximations to correct IEC CTDI measurements for a wide-beam CT scanner.
Weir VJ; Zhang J
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5360-5365. PubMed ID: 31484208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization and implementation of OSL dosimeters for use in evaluating the efficacy of organ-based tube current modulation for CT scans of the face and orbits.
Marsh RM; Silosky M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1730-8. PubMed ID: 25832062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An optically stimulated luminescence system to measure dose profiles in x-ray computed tomography.
Yukihara EG; Ruan C; Gasparian PB; Clouse WJ; Kalavagunta C; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6337-52. PubMed ID: 19809126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration and error analysis of metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters for computed tomography radiation dosimetry.
Trattner S; Prinsen P; Wiegert J; Gerland EL; Shefer E; Morton T; Thompson CM; Yagil Y; Cheng B; Jambawalikar S; Al-Senan R; Amurao M; Halliburton SS; Einstein AJ
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6589-6602. PubMed ID: 28940306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SU-E-I-48: Comparison of CTDIw and Averaged CTDI Over X-Y Plane.
Liang Y; Emerson S; Schultz C
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part4):3635-3636. PubMed ID: 28519502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of weighted CTDI in estimating average dose delivered to CTDI phantoms: An experimental study.
Treb K; Li K
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6484-6499. PubMed ID: 33034041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method to acquire CT organ dose map using OSL dosimeters and ATOM anthropomorphic phantoms.
Zhang D; Li X; Gao Y; Xu XG; Liu B
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081918. PubMed ID: 23927332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry methods for multi-detector computed tomography.
Gancheva M; Dyakov I; Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Taseva D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):190-3. PubMed ID: 25889607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomography dose index and dose length product for cone-beam CT: Monte Carlo simulations.
Kim S; Song H; Samei E; Yin FF; Yoshizumi TT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 12(2):3395. PubMed ID: 21587186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a GEANT4 radiation transport code for CT dosimetry.
Carver DE; Kost SD; Fernald MJ; Lewis KG; Fraser ND; Pickens DR; Price RR; Stabin MG
Health Phys; 2015 Apr; 108(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 25706135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Determination of computer tomography dose index by means of ion chamber measurements].
Piermattei A; Cichocki F; Rossi G; Venga L; Arcovito G
Radiol Med; 1995; 89(1-2):151-4. PubMed ID: 7716297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range.
Al-Senan RM; Hatab MR
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4396-405. PubMed ID: 21859040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of an X-Ray Dose Profile Derived from an Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter during Computed Tomographic Fluoroscopy.
Hasegawa H; Sato M; Tanaka H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132154. PubMed ID: 26151914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concepts for dose determination in flat-detector CT.
Kyriakou Y; Deak P; Langner O; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3551-66. PubMed ID: 18552416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
