231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127071)
1. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images.
Wang J; Christner JA; Duan X; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6772-8. PubMed ID: 23127071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6764-71. PubMed ID: 23127070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of topogram-based body size indices for CT dose consideration and scan protocol optimization.
Li B; Behrman RH; Norbash AM
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3456-65. PubMed ID: 22755725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new method for CT dose estimation by determining patient water equivalent diameter from localizer radiographs: Geometric transformation and calibration methods using readily available phantoms.
Zhang D; Mihai G; Barbaras LG; Brook OR; Palmer MR
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3371-3378. PubMed ID: 29746705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Water calibration for CT scanners with tube voltage modulation.
Ritschl L; Bergner F; Fleischmann C; Kachelriess M
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4107-17. PubMed ID: 20601772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating patient dose from x-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates.
Ikuta I; Warden GI; Andriole KP; Khorasani R; Sodickson A
Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):472-80. PubMed ID: 24086075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consistent low-contrast detectability for variable patient sizes and corresponding dose in abdominal CT.
Zhou Y; Nute J; Scott A; Lee C
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):861-872. PubMed ID: 28039857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A methodology to estimate the patient diameter and thickness from thoracic and abdominal projection radiographs of adult patients.
Dedulle A; Fitousi N; Jacobs J; Marshall NW; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 66(14):. PubMed ID: 34157703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose dependence on subject size in abdominal computed tomography: Water phantom and patient model comparison.
Li X; Yang K; Liu B
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2309-2317. PubMed ID: 29582439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT.
Kalender WA; Deak P; Kellermeier M; van Straten M; Vollmar SV
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):993-1007. PubMed ID: 19378760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low tube voltage dual source computed tomography to reduce contrast media doses in adult abdomen examinations: A phantom study.
Thor D; Brismar TB; Fischer MA
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5100-9. PubMed ID: 26328961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CALIBRATING PIXEL VALUES OF THE CT LOCALIZER RADIOGRAPH FOR CALCULATING WATER-EQUIVALENT DIAMETER AND SIZE-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATE.
Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Toyoda T; Sato N; Haryanto F; Widita R; Arif I; Dougherty G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Apr; 179(2):158-168. PubMed ID: 29136233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-size-dependent radiation dose optimisation technique for abdominal CT examinations.
Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 21357583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner.
Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental implementation of a joint statistical image reconstruction method for proton stopping power mapping from dual-energy CT data.
Zhang S; Han D; Williamson JF; Zhao T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):273-285. PubMed ID: 30421790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attenuation-based size metric for estimating organ dose to patients undergoing tube current modulated CT exams.
Bostani M; McMillan K; Lu P; Kim HJ; Cagnon CH; DeMarco JJ; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):958-68. PubMed ID: 25652508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
