162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127093)
1. An image-based technique to assess the perceptual quality of clinical chest radiographs.
Lin Y; Luo H; Dobbins JT; Page McAdams H; Wang X; Sehnert WJ; Barski L; Foos DH; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7019-31. PubMed ID: 23127093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated characterization of perceptual quality of clinical chest radiographs: validation and calibration to observer preference.
Samei E; Lin Y; Choudhury KR; McAdams HP
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111918. PubMed ID: 25370651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated quality control assessment of clinical chest images.
Willis CE; Nishino TK; Wells JR; Ai HA; Wilson JM; Samei E
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4377-4391. PubMed ID: 30053326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of algorithmic CT image quality metrics with preferences of radiologists.
Cheng Y; Abadi E; Smith TB; Ria F; Meyer M; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4837-4846. PubMed ID: 31465538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterizing Scatter Correction Software of 5 Mobile Radiography Units: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; Vereecke E; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2022 Jul; 57(7):444-452. PubMed ID: 35085123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: mutual information as a measure of image quality.
Armato SG; Sensakovic WF; Passen SJ; Engelmann R; MacMahon H
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5675-82. PubMed ID: 20095280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image-processing technique for suppressing ribs in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network (MTANN).
Suzuki K; Abe H; MacMahon H; Doi K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Apr; 25(4):406-16. PubMed ID: 16608057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs.
Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Lanhede B; Almén A; Sandborg M; McVey G; Mattsson S; Panzer W; Besjakov J; Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Alm Carlsson G; Dance DR; Tylén U; Zankl M
Br J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 77(915):204-15. PubMed ID: 15020361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of computerized method for lung nodule detection on digital chest radiographs using similar subtraction images from different patients.
Aoki T; Oda N; Yamashita Y; Yamamoto K; Korogi Y
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1062-7. PubMed ID: 21382681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs.
Tingberg A; Eriksson F; Medin J; Besjakov J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Sandborg M; Almén A; Lanhede B; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 15933082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technologist-Directed Repeat Musculoskeletal and Chest Radiographs: How Often Do They Impact Diagnosis?
Rosenkrantz AB; Jacobs JE; Jain N; Brusca-Augello G; Mechlin M; Parente M; Recht MP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1297-1301. PubMed ID: 28898128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-ratio grid considerations in mobile chest radiography.
Scott AW; Gauntt DM; Yester MV; Barnes GT
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3142-53. PubMed ID: 22755699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.
De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization.
Li F; Hara T; Shiraishi J; Engelmann R; MacMahon H; Doi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41. PubMed ID: 21512042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
