These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127093)

  • 1. An image-based technique to assess the perceptual quality of clinical chest radiographs.
    Lin Y; Luo H; Dobbins JT; Page McAdams H; Wang X; Sehnert WJ; Barski L; Foos DH; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7019-31. PubMed ID: 23127093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated characterization of perceptual quality of clinical chest radiographs: validation and calibration to observer preference.
    Samei E; Lin Y; Choudhury KR; McAdams HP
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111918. PubMed ID: 25370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated quality control assessment of clinical chest images.
    Willis CE; Nishino TK; Wells JR; Ai HA; Wilson JM; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4377-4391. PubMed ID: 30053326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of algorithmic CT image quality metrics with preferences of radiologists.
    Cheng Y; Abadi E; Smith TB; Ria F; Meyer M; Marin D; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4837-4846. PubMed ID: 31465538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing Scatter Correction Software of 5 Mobile Radiography Units: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.
    Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; Vereecke E; Achten E; Bacher K
    Invest Radiol; 2022 Jul; 57(7):444-452. PubMed ID: 35085123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: mutual information as a measure of image quality.
    Armato SG; Sensakovic WF; Passen SJ; Engelmann R; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5675-82. PubMed ID: 20095280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image-processing technique for suppressing ribs in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network (MTANN).
    Suzuki K; Abe H; MacMahon H; Doi K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Apr; 25(4):406-16. PubMed ID: 16608057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Lanhede B; Almén A; Sandborg M; McVey G; Mattsson S; Panzer W; Besjakov J; Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Alm Carlsson G; Dance DR; Tylén U; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 77(915):204-15. PubMed ID: 15020361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of computerized method for lung nodule detection on digital chest radiographs using similar subtraction images from different patients.
    Aoki T; Oda N; Yamashita Y; Yamamoto K; Korogi Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1062-7. PubMed ID: 21382681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Eriksson F; Medin J; Besjakov J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Sandborg M; Almén A; Lanhede B; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 15933082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technologist-Directed Repeat Musculoskeletal and Chest Radiographs: How Often Do They Impact Diagnosis?
    Rosenkrantz AB; Jacobs JE; Jain N; Brusca-Augello G; Mechlin M; Parente M; Recht MP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1297-1301. PubMed ID: 28898128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-ratio grid considerations in mobile chest radiography.
    Scott AW; Gauntt DM; Yester MV; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3142-53. PubMed ID: 22755699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.
    De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization.
    Li F; Hara T; Shiraishi J; Engelmann R; MacMahon H; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41. PubMed ID: 21512042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.