162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127093)
21. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Temporal subtraction for detection of solitary pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: evaluation of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system.
Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Tsubamoto M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Saki H; Fujiwara K
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):806-11. PubMed ID: 12034953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the quality of temporal subtraction images obtained with manual and automated methods of digital chest radiography.
Katsuragawa S; Tagashira H; Li Q; MacMahon H; Doi K
J Digit Imaging; 1999 Nov; 12(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 10587911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations.
Ravenel JG; Scalzetti EM; Huda W; Garrisi W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 11461845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Temporal subtraction for the detection of hazy pulmonary opacities on chest radiography.
Tsubamoto M; Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Fujiwara K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 12130454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee KH; Kim TJ; Mantiuk R; Kang HS; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W30-7. PubMed ID: 18647883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography.
Launders JH; Kengyelics SM; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):986-97. PubMed ID: 9650189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Evaluation of an automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiographs].
Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 1561056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
Chotas HG; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images? Pilot study.
Kalra MK; Wittram C; Maher MM; Sharma A; Avinash GB; Karau K; Toth TL; Halpern E; Saini S; Shepard JA
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):257-64. PubMed ID: 12750460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of radiologists in detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: effect of rib suppression with a massive-training artificial neural network.
Oda S; Awai K; Suzuki K; Yanaga Y; Funama Y; MacMahon H; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):W397-402. PubMed ID: 19843717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Regional variance of visually lossless threshold in compressed chest CT images: lung versus mediastinum and chest wall.
Kim TJ; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Chun EJ; Bajpai V; Kim YH; Hahn S; Lee KW
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 18194845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: detection and characterization of interstitial lung disease in digital chest radiographs.
Katsuragawa S; Doi K; MacMahon H
Med Phys; 1988; 15(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 3405134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
