162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127093)
41. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
Salát D; Nikodemová D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of pulmonary function using breathing chest radiography with a dynamic flat panel detector: primary results in pulmonary diseases.
Tanaka R; Sanada S; Okazaki N; Kobayashi T; Fujimura M; Yasui M; Matsui T; Nakayama K; Nanbu Y; Matsui O
Invest Radiol; 2006 Oct; 41(10):735-45. PubMed ID: 16971797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reducing the absorbed dose in analogue radiography of infant chest images by improving the image quality, using image processing techniques.
Karimian A; Yazdani S; Askari MA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):176-9. PubMed ID: 21743073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for the detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs: localized search method based on anatomical classification.
Shiraishi J; Li Q; Suzuki K; Engelmann R; Doi K
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2642-53. PubMed ID: 16898468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: model.
Kayargadde V; Martens JB
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1996 Jun; 13(6):1178-88. PubMed ID: 8926548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Detection of lung nodules on digital chest radiographs: potential usefulness of a new contralateral subtraction technique.
Tsukuda S; Heshiki A; Katsuragawa S; Li Q; MacMahon H; Doi K
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 11930067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effect of temporal subtraction technique on interpretation time and diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography.
Kakeda S; Kamada K; Hatakeyama Y; Aoki T; Korogi Y; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1253-9. PubMed ID: 17056913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Usefulness of computerized method for lung nodule detection in digital chest radiographs using temporal subtraction images.
Aoki T; Oda N; Yamashita Y; Yamamoto K; Korogi Y
Acad Radiol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):1000-5. PubMed ID: 21718956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: automated analysis of sizes of heart and lung in chest images.
Nakamori N; Doi K; Sabeti V; MacMahon H
Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 2143554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Correlation of clinical and physical-technical image quality in chest CT: a human cadaver study applied on iterative reconstruction.
De Crop A; Smeets P; Van Hoof T; Vergauwen M; Dewaele T; Van Borsel M; Achten E; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H; Bacher K
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Aug; 15():32. PubMed ID: 26286596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Automated registration of frontal and lateral radionuclide lung scans with digital chest radiographs.
Armato SG; Giger ML; Chen CT; Vyborny CJ; Ryan J; MacMahon H
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jul; 7(7):530-9. PubMed ID: 10902962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Exposure equalization radiography of the chest: clinical comparison of slit and raster scanning techniques.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jun; 144(6):1171-81. PubMed ID: 3873796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.
Lanhede B; Båth M; Kheddache S; Sund P; Björneld L; Widell M; Almén A; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Panzer W; Zankl M; Månsson LG
Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):38-49. PubMed ID: 11806957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Application of Deconvolution Algorithm of Point Spread Function in Improving Image Quality: An Observer Preference Study on Chest Radiography.
Chae KJ; Goo JM; Ahn SY; Yoo JY; Yoon SH
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(1):147-152. PubMed ID: 29354011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
