239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127106)
21. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative
Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320. PubMed ID: 27782704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radioembolization lung shunt estimation based on a
Kunnen B; van der Velden S; Bastiaannet R; Lam MGEH; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4744-4753. PubMed ID: 30179259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transconvolution and the virtual positron emission tomograph--a new method for cross calibration in quantitative PET∕CT imaging.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Hentschel M; Klaeser B; Krause T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):062503. PubMed ID: 23718608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Low-dose 90Y PET/CT imaging optimized for lesion detectability and quantitative accuracy: a phantom study to assess the feasibility of pretherapy imaging to plan the therapeutic dose.
Khazaee M; Kamali-Asl A; Geramifar P; Rahmim A
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):985-997. PubMed ID: 28902765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of fluorine-18 and bromine-76 imaging in positron emission tomography.
Ribeiro MJ; Almeida P; Strul D; Ferreira N; Loc'h C; Brulon V; Trébossen R; Mazière B; Bendriem B
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul; 26(7):758-66. PubMed ID: 10398824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Practical reconstruction protocol for quantitative (90)Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT.
Siman W; Mikell JK; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5093. PubMed ID: 27587040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Study-parameter impact in quantitative 90-Yttrium PET imaging for radioembolization treatment monitoring and dosimetry.
Goedicke A; Berker Y; Verburg FA; Behrendt FF; Winz O; Mottaghy FM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Mar; 32(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 23047863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of quantitative Y-90 SPECT and non-time-of-flight PET imaging in post-therapy radioembolization of liver cancer.
Yue J; Mauxion T; Reyes DK; Lodge MA; Hobbs RF; Rong X; Dong Y; Herman JM; Wahl RL; Geschwind JH; Frey EC
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5779. PubMed ID: 27782730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of two commercial whole body PET systems based on LSO and BGO crystals respectively for brain imaging.
Trébossen R; Comtat C; Brulon V; Bailly P; Meyer ME
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1399-409. PubMed ID: 19472647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. (90)Y-PET/CT Imaging Quantification for Dosimetry in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Analysis and Corrections of the Impairing Factors.
Fabbri C; Bartolomei M; Mattone V; Casi M; De Lauro F; Bartolini N; Gentili G; Amadori S; Agostini M; Sarti G
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Jun; 30(5):200-10. PubMed ID: 25860616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.
Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multi institutional quantitative phantom study of yttrium-90 PET in PET/MRI: the MR-QUEST study.
Maughan NM; Eldib M; Faul D; Conti M; Elschot M; Knešaurek K; Leek F; Townsend D; DiFilippo FP; Jackson K; Nekolla SG; Lukas M; Tapner M; Parikh PJ; Laforest R
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Apr; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 29616365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET/CT with a Large Axial Field of View for Reducing Whole-Body Acquisition Time.
Akamatsu G; Uba K; Taniguchi T; Mitsumoto K; Narisue A; Tsutsui Y; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Jun; 42(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 24799607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The SRT reconstruction algorithm for semiquantification in PET imaging.
Kastis GA; Gaitanis A; Samartzis AP; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5970-82. PubMed ID: 26429272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging.
Attarwala AA; Molina-Duran F; Büsing KA; Schönberg SO; Bailey DL; Willowson K; Glatting G
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110401. PubMed ID: 25369020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of PMT-based TF64 and SiPM-based Vereos PET/CT systems for
Trotta N; Collette B; Mathey C; Vierasu I; Bucalau AM; Verset G; Moreno-Reyes R; Goldman S
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7567-7582. PubMed ID: 35894818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of Co-57 and CT Transmission Measurements on the Quantification Accuracy and Partial Volume Effect of a Small Animal PET Scanner.
Mannheim JG; Schmid AM; Pichler BJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Dec; 19(6):825-836. PubMed ID: 28361250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
