BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127214)

  • 1. Postcranial sex estimation of individuals considered Hispanic.
    Tise ML; Spradley MK; Anderson BE
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S9-14. PubMed ID: 23127214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postcranial sex estimation criteria for Mexican Hispanics.
    Spradley MK; Anderson BE; Tise ML
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S27-31. PubMed ID: 25421007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metric sex estimation from the postcranial skeleton for the Colombian population.
    Moore MK; DiGangi EA; Niño Ruíz FP; Hidalgo Davila OJ; Sanabria Medina C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():286.e1-8. PubMed ID: 27032896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and Assessment of Postcranial Sex Estimation Methods for a Guatemalan Population.
    Fowler G; Hughes C
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):490-496. PubMed ID: 28580662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
    DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discriminant function analysis for sex assessment in pelvic girdle bones: sample from the contemporary Mexican population.
    Gómez-Valdés JA; Torres Ramírez G; Báez Molgado S; Herrera Sain-Leu P; Castrejón Caballero JL; Sánchez-Mejorada G
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 21265837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Demographic change and forensic identification: problems in metric identification of Hispanic skeletons.
    Spradley MK; Jantz RL; Robinson A; Peccerelli F
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18279234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex assessment from carpals bones: discriminant function analysis in a contemporary Mexican sample.
    Mastrangelo P; De Luca S; Sánchez-Mejorada G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):196.e1-15. PubMed ID: 21592694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements.
    Spradley MK; Jantz RL
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 21210801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex assessment using clavicle measurements: inter- and intra-population comparisons.
    Králík M; Urbanová P; Wagenknechtová M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():181.e1-15. PubMed ID: 24075622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postcraniometric sex and ancestry estimation in South Africa: a validation study.
    Liebenberg L; Krüger GC; L'Abbé EN; Stull KE
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jan; 133(1):289-296. PubMed ID: 29797281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Nonmetric Sex Classification for Hispanic Individuals.
    Klales AR; Cole SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):975-980. PubMed ID: 28070893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metric characterization of the human coxal bone on a recent Italian sample and multivariate discriminant analysis to determine sex.
    Vacca E; Di Vella G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):401.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22770620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework.
    Krishan K; Chatterjee PM; Kanchan T; Kaur S; Baryah N; Singh RK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():165.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26926105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex determination from the radius and ulna in a modern South African sample.
    Barrier IL; L'Abbé EN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):85.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18511225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of methods to determine sex by evaluating the greater sciatic notch: Visual, angular and geometric morphometrics.
    Gómez-Valdés JA; Quinto-Sánchez M; Menéndez Garmendia A; Veleminska J; Sánchez-Mejorada G; Bruzek J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):156.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22607977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex determination from the talus in a contemporary Greek population using discriminant function analysis.
    Peckmann TR; Orr K; Meek S; Manolis SK
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Jul; 33():14-9. PubMed ID: 26048490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Osteometric sex discrimination from the sternal extremity of the fourth rib in a recent forensic sample from Southwestern Spain.
    Macaluso PJ; Rico A; Santos M; Lucena J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):375.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23068090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex assessment from the carpals bones: discriminant function analysis in a 20th century Spanish sample.
    Mastrangelo P; De Luca S; Alemán I; Botella MC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):216.e1-10. PubMed ID: 21295424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forearm bones and sexual variation in Turkish population.
    Uzün I; Işcan MY; Celbiş O
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Dec; 32(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 21546820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.