These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127309)

  • 1. Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance.
    Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Strauch K; Terry MB
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R144. PubMed ID: 23127309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study.
    Terry MB; Liao Y; Whittemore AS; Leoce N; Buchsbaum R; Zeinomar N; Dite GS; Chung WK; Knight JA; Southey MC; Milne RL; Goldgar D; Giles GG; McLachlan SA; Friedlander ML; Weideman PC; Glendon G; Nesci S; Andrulis IL; John EM; Phillips KA; Daly MB; Buys SS; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Apr; 20(4):504-517. PubMed ID: 30799262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of breast cancer risk assessment tools on a French-Canadian population-based cohort.
    Jantzen R; Payette Y; de Malliard T; Labbé C; Noisel N; Broët P
    BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e045078. PubMed ID: 33846154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing breast cancer risk models in Marin County, a population with high rates of delayed childbirth.
    Powell M; Jamshidian F; Cheyne K; Nititham J; Prebil LA; Ereman R
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Jun; 14(3):212-220.e1. PubMed ID: 24461459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical problems with clinical guidelines for breast cancer prevention based on remaining lifetime risk.
    Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Hopper JL; Strauch K; Terry MB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jul; 107(7):. PubMed ID: 25956172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of the IBIS/Tyrer-Cuzick model of breast cancer risk by race and ethnicity in the Women's Health Initiative.
    Kurian AW; Hughes E; Simmons T; Bernhisel R; Probst B; Meek S; Caswell-Jin JL; John EM; Lanchbury JS; Slavin TP; Wagner S; Gutin A; Rohan TE; Shadyab AH; Manson JE; Lane D; Chlebowski RT; Stefanick ML
    Cancer; 2021 Oct; 127(20):3742-3750. PubMed ID: 34228814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of Breast Cancer Risk-Assessment Models in a Large Mammography Cohort.
    McCarthy AM; Guan Z; Welch M; Griffin ME; Sippo DA; Deng Z; Coopey SB; Acar A; Semine A; Parmigiani G; Braun D; Hughes KS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 May; 112(5):489-497. PubMed ID: 31556450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating breast cancer risk projections for Hispanic women.
    Banegas MP; Gail MH; LaCroix A; Thompson B; Martinez ME; Wactawski-Wende J; John EM; Hubbell FA; Yasmeen S; Katki HA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 132(1):347-53. PubMed ID: 22147080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model based on the key risk factors: family history, mammographic density and polygenic risk.
    Allman R; Mu Y; Dite GS; Spaeth E; Hopper JL; Rosner BA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Apr; 198(2):335-347. PubMed ID: 36749458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry.
    Pal Choudhury P; Brook MN; Hurson AN; Lee A; Mulder CV; Coulson P; Schoemaker MJ; Jones ME; Swerdlow AJ; Chatterjee N; Antoniou AC; Garcia-Closas M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2021 Feb; 23(1):22. PubMed ID: 33588869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Clinical Models and 77 Independent Risk-Associated SNPs for Women Aged Under 50 Years: Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry.
    Dite GS; MacInnis RJ; Bickerstaffe A; Dowty JG; Allman R; Apicella C; Milne RL; Tsimiklis H; Phillips KA; Giles GG; Terry MB; Southey MC; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Feb; 25(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 26677205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer risk based on adapted IBIS prediction model in Slovenian women aged 40-49 years - could it be better?
    Oblak T; Zadnik V; Krajc M; Lokar K; Zgajnar J
    Radiol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 54(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 32614783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective Evaluation over 15 Years of Six Breast Cancer Risk Models.
    Li SX; Milne RL; Nguyen-Dumont T; English DR; Giles GG; Southey MC; Antoniou AC; Lee A; Winship I; Hopper JL; Terry MB; MacInnis RJ
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 34680343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validating the IBIS and BOADICEA Models for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk in the Iranian Population.
    Ghoncheh M; Ziaee F; Karami M; Poorolajal J
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(3):e113-e118. PubMed ID: 28216418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of two US breast cancer risk prediction models in German women.
    Hüsing A; Quante AS; Chang-Claude J; Aleksandrova K; Kaaks R; Pfeiffer RM
    Cancer Causes Control; 2020 Jun; 31(6):525-536. PubMed ID: 32253639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail in Breast Cancer Screening in Jiangxi Province, China.
    Zhang L; Jie Z; Xu S; Zhang L; Guo X
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Aug; 24():5528-5532. PubMed ID: 30089770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.
    Brentnall AR; Harkness EF; Astley SM; Donnelly LS; Stavrinos P; Sampson S; Fox L; Sergeant JC; Harvie MN; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Howell A; Cuzick J; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Dec; 17(1):147. PubMed ID: 26627479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective Evaluation of the Addition of Polygenic Risk Scores to Breast Cancer Risk Models.
    Li SX; Milne RL; Nguyen-Dumont T; Wang X; English DR; Giles GG; Southey MC; Antoniou AC; Lee A; Li S; Winship I; Hopper JL; Terry MB; MacInnis RJ
    JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Jun; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 33977228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool Among Women Age 75 Years and Older.
    Schonberg MA; Li VW; Eliassen AH; Davis RB; LaCroix AZ; McCarthy EP; Rosner BA; Chlebowski RT; Rohan TE; Hankinson SE; Marcantonio ER; Ngo LH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Mar; 108(3):. PubMed ID: 26625899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discriminatory accuracy and potential clinical utility of genomic profiling for breast cancer risk in BRCA-negative women.
    Comen E; Balistreri L; Gönen M; Dutra-Clarke A; Fazio M; Vijai J; Stadler Z; Kauff N; Kirchhoff T; Hudis C; Offit K; Robson M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jun; 127(2):479-87. PubMed ID: 20957429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.