These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23127857)

  • 1. One's own name distorts visual space.
    Yamada Y; Kawabe T; Miura K
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Dec; 531(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 23127857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional load and the consciousness of one's own name.
    Lin SH; Yeh YY
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 May; 26():197-203. PubMed ID: 24762974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the specificity of the response to the own first-name when presented as a novel in a passive oddball paradigm? An ERP study.
    Eichenlaub JB; Ruby P; Morlet D
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1447():65-78. PubMed ID: 22361115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short article one's own face is hard to ignore.
    Brédart S; Delchambre M; Laureys S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16556557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gatecrashing the visual cocktail party: How visual and semantic similarity modulate the own name benefit in the attentional blink.
    Dent K; Cole GG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1102-1111. PubMed ID: 29747555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain activation when hearing one's own and others' names.
    Carmody DP; Lewis M
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1116(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 16959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Months in space: synaesthesia modulates attention and action.
    Diesendruck L; Gertner L; Botzer L; Goldfarb L; Karniel A; Henik A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 Dec; 27(8):665-79. PubMed ID: 21846170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objections against the view of visual extinction as an attentional disengagement deficit: the interaction between spatial position and temporal modulation.
    de Haan B; Karnath HO
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 21513929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is visual attention automatically attracted to one's own name?
    Bundesen C; Kyllingsbaek S; Houmann KJ; Jensen RM
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jul; 59(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 9259638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cognitive advantage for one's own name is not simply familiarity: an eye-tracking study.
    Yang H; Wang F; Gu N; Gao X; Zhao G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1176-80. PubMed ID: 23553121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motor familiarity: brain activation when watching kinematic displays of one's own movements.
    Bischoff M; Zentgraf K; Lorey B; Pilgramm S; Balser N; Baumgartner E; Hohmann T; Stark R; Vaitl D; Munzert J
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):2085-92. PubMed ID: 22609578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of visual stimuli and memory for spatial context in schizophrenic patients and healthy volunteers.
    Brébion G; David AS; Pilowsky LS; Jones H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Nov; 26(8):1093-102. PubMed ID: 15590462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focused visual attention distorts distance perception away from the attentional locus.
    Wardak C; Denève S; Ben Hamed S
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 21147135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lateralized responses during covert attention are modulated by target eccentricity.
    Bahramisharif A; Heskes T; Jensen O; van Gerven MA
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 491(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 21215296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.