These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23128583)

  • 1. A mixture distribution of spatial attention.
    Feng J; Spence I
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 23128583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to early processes in reading.
    Besner D; Risko EF; Sklair N
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 16035344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.
    Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning.
    Wilson PN; Alexander T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1552-67. PubMed ID: 20119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid targeting followed by sustained deployment of visual spatial attention.
    Simpson GV; Dale CL; Luks TL; Miller WL; Ritter W; Foxe JJ
    Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1595-9. PubMed ID: 17001275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional processing of colour and location cues.
    Dunai J; Castiello U; Rossetti Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jun; 138(4):520-6. PubMed ID: 11465751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention.
    Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Funes MJ; Fu X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):516-30. PubMed ID: 19565432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial cueing in time-space synesthetes: An event-related brain potential study.
    Teuscher U; Brang D; Ramachandran VS; Coulson S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20637536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The deployment of visual spatial attention during visual search predicts response time: electrophysiological evidence from the N2pc.
    Drisdelle BL; West GL; Jolicoeur P
    Neuroreport; 2016 Nov; 27(16):1237-42. PubMed ID: 27648715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.
    Jones CM; Gray R; Spence C; Tan HZ
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 186(4):659-69. PubMed ID: 18224305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the global effect and inhibition of return.
    De Vries JP; Van der Stigchel S; Hooge IT; Verstraten FA
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2999-3009. PubMed ID: 27377069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The automaticity of vantage point shifts within a synaesthetes' spatial calendar.
    Jarick M; Jensen C; Dixon MJ; Smilek D
    J Neuropsychol; 2011 Sep; 5(2):333-52. PubMed ID: 21923793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.