These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23128585)

  • 1. Conflict-specific effects of accessory stimuli on cognitive control in the Stroop task and the Simon task.
    Soutschek A; Müller HJ; Schubert T
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 23128585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.
    Kim S; Lee SH; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():51-61. PubMed ID: 26479902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception.
    Wittfoth M; Buck D; Fahle M; Herrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):921-9. PubMed ID: 16677831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: evidence from a Simon task.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kiesel A
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 20178922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1505-32. PubMed ID: 27149295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual versus auditory Simon effect: A behavioural and physiological investigation.
    D'Ascenzo S; Lugli L; Baroni G; Guidotti R; Rubichi S; Iani C; Nicoletti R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):917-930. PubMed ID: 28293982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: an fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task.
    Chen Z; Lei X; Ding C; Li H; Chen A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():577-84. PubMed ID: 23103691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Stroop-like and Simon Effects on Perceptual Features.
    Scerrati E; Lugli L; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17815. PubMed ID: 29259275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI.
    Liu X; Banich MT; Jacobson BL; Tanabe JL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1097-106. PubMed ID: 15219581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.
    Freitas AL; Clark SL
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jan; 79(1):143-62. PubMed ID: 24487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict control of emotional and non-emotional conflicts in preadolescent children.
    Liu T; Liu X; Li D; Shangguan F; Lu L; Shi J
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107708. PubMed ID: 31153934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociable early attentional control mechanisms underlying cognitive and affective conflicts.
    Chen T; Kendrick KM; Feng C; Sun S; Yang X; Wang X; Luo W; Yang S; Huang X; Valdés-Sosa PA; Gong Q; Fan J; Luo YJ
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37633. PubMed ID: 27892513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional characteristics of control adaptation in intermodal sensory processing.
    Melcher T; Pfister R; Busmann M; Schlüter MC; Leyhe T; Gruber O
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():43-55. PubMed ID: 25917247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.
    Wühr P; Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):779-801. PubMed ID: 25380403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct effects of trial-driven and task Set-related control in primary visual cortex.
    Griffis JC; Elkhetali AS; Vaden RJ; Visscher KM
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():285-297. PubMed ID: 26163806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The transfer of location-based control requires location-based conflict.
    Pickel L; Pratt J; Weidler BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2788-2797. PubMed ID: 31309529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.