217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23128861)
1. Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.
Knudsen AB; Hur C; Gazelle GS; Schrag D; McFarland EG; Kuntz KM
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Nov; 157(9):611-20. PubMed ID: 23128861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Greuter MJE; de Klerk CM; Meijer GA; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):544-554. PubMed ID: 28973514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Knudsen AB; Ladabaum U
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 171(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 31546257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People.
Redwood DG; Dinh TA; Kisiel JB; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Provost EM; Sacco FD; Tiesinga JJ; Ahlquist DA
Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 May; 96(5):1203-1217. PubMed ID: 33840520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.
Peterse EFP; Meester RGS; de Jonge L; Omidvari AH; Alarid-Escudero F; Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Feb; 113(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 32761199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Knudsen AB; Rutter CM; Peterse EFP; Lietz AP; Seguin CL; Meester RGS; Perdue LA; Lin JS; Siegel RL; Doria-Rose VP; Feuer EJ; Zauber AG; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1998-2011. PubMed ID: 34003219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.
Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A
Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
van Hees F; Habbema JD; Meester RG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG
Ann Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 160(11):750-9. PubMed ID: 24887616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.
Atkin W; Cross AJ; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Pearson S; Wooldrage K; Brown J; Lucas F; Prendergast A; Marchevsky N; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Skrobanski H; Kerrison R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran S
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-84. PubMed ID: 30618357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.
Kuntz KM; Popp J; Beck JR; Zauber AG; Weinberg DS
BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 32933928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
