626 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23129519)
1. Automated ultrasonographic measurement of basic fetal growth parameters.
Pashaj S; Merz E; Petrela E
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 23129519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.
Papageorghiou AT; Kemp B; Stones W; Ohuma EO; Kennedy SH; Purwar M; Salomon LJ; Altman DG; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Pang R; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Jaffer YA; Victora CG; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):719-726. PubMed ID: 26924421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age.
Karki DB; Sharmqa UK; Rauniyar RK
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(162):233-7. PubMed ID: 17189967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements.
Chan LW; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19277977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
von Kaisenberg CS; Fritzer E; Kühling H; Jonat W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Innovative virtual reality measurements for embryonic growth and development.
Verwoerd-Dikkeboom CM; Koning AH; Hop WC; van der Spek PJ; Exalto N; Steegers EA
Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 20304967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters.
Verburg BO; Mulder PG; Hofman A; Jaddoe VW; Witteman JC; Steegers EA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 18324617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements.
Zalud I; Good S; Carneiro G; Georgescu B; Aoki K; Green L; Shahrestani F; Okumura R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jan; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19165678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical implications of machine-probe combinations on obstetric ultrasound measurements used in pregnancy dating.
Axell R; Lynch C; Chudleigh T; Bradshaw L; Mangat J; White P; Lees C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22190416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection and measurement of fetal anatomies from ultrasound images using a constrained probabilistic boosting tree.
Carneiro G; Georgescu B; Good S; Comaniciu D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1342-55. PubMed ID: 18753047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normal Fetal Growth Profile at 10-41 Weeks of Gestation - An Update Based on 10225 Normal Singleton Pregnancies and Measurement of the Fetal Parameters Using 3D Ultrasound.
Merz E; Pashaj S; Wellek S
Ultraschall Med; 2023 Apr; 44(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 36587624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.
Salim I; Cavallaro A; Ciofolo-Veit C; Rouet L; Raynaud C; Mory B; Collet Billon A; Harrison G; Roundhill D; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):650-654. PubMed ID: 30478919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal caliper placement: manual vs automated methods.
Yazdi B; Zanker P; Wanger P; Sonek J; Pintoffl K; Hoopmann M; Kagan KO
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 23671025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prenatal diagnose of abnormalities of fetal limb bone].
Song J; Wang X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 45(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 21176554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21
Stirnemann J; Villar J; Salomon LJ; Ohuma E; Ruyan P; Altman DG; Nosten F; Craik R; Munim S; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Norris S; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Victora CG; Uauy R; Bhutta Z; Kennedy S; Papageorghiou AT; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 27804212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practical biometric ratios of first-trimester screening.
Ergin RN; Yayla M; Ergin AS
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2013; 40(1):106-8. PubMed ID: 23724520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
