These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23130049)

  • 1. Comparison of three pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a randomised clinical trial.
    Farrokh Gisoure E
    Iran Endod J; 2011; 6(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 23130049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.
    Markovic D; Zivojinovic V; Vucetic M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Sep; 6(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16216093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study.
    Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sodium Hypochlorite Versus Formocresol and Ferric Sulfate Pulpotomies in Primary Molars: 18-month Follow-up.
    Farsi DJ; El-Khodary HM; Farsi NM; El Ashiry EA; Yagmoor MA; Alzain SM
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 26883612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of ankaferd blood stopper, ferric sulfate, and formocresol as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: A clinical study.
    Ozmen B; Bayrak S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):832-838. PubMed ID: 28791977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Courson F; Durieux P; Muller-Bolla M; Glenny AM; Fron Chabouis H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; (8):CD003220. PubMed ID: 25099759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of the relative efficacy of Buckley's Formocresol and calcium hydroxide in primary molar vital pulp therapy.
    Waterhouse PJ; Nunn JH; Whitworth JM
    Br Dent J; 2000 Jan; 188(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 10697342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol on vital pulp after pulpotomy of primary molars: An in vivo study.
    Godhi B; Sood PB; Sharma A
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2011 Oct; 2(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 22346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate.
    Durmus B; Tanboga I
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 May; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 24717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of formocresol and ferric sulfate as pulpotomy material in primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Veettil SK; Dhar V
    Quintessence Int; 2020; 51(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 31781690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laser Pulpotomy-An Effective Alternative to Conventional Techniques: A 12 Months Clinicoradiographic Study.
    Gupta G; Rana V; Srivastava N; Chandna P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 8(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 26124576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Success Rates of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars using Ferric Sulfate and Bioactive Tricalcium Silicate Cement: An
    Sirohi K; Marwaha M; Gupta A; Bansal K; Srivastava A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 10(2):147-151. PubMed ID: 28890614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histological evaluation of electrosurgery and formocresol pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth in dogs.
    El-Meligy O; Abdalla M; El-Baraway S; El-Tekya M; Dean JA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 26(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 11688819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Four Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ansari G; Morovati SP; Asgary S
    Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29692828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Noorollahian H
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No clear evidence of superiority regarding pulp medicaments in primary molars.
    Elkhadem A; Sami I
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):100-1. PubMed ID: 25522937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and sodium hypochlorite pulpotomies: A prospective 24-month study.
    Lin YT; Lin YJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Jun; 119(6):1080-1085. PubMed ID: 31635844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    Hugar SM; Reddy R; Deshpande SD; Shigli A; Gokhale NS; Hugar SS
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2017; 8(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 28566863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.