These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23132024)

  • 1. Experimental demonstration of quantum digital signatures using phase-encoded coherent states of light.
    Clarke PJ; Collins RJ; Dunjko V; Andersson E; Jeffers J; Buller GS
    Nat Commun; 2012; 3():1174. PubMed ID: 23132024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Security of quantum digital signatures for classical messages.
    Wang TY; Cai XQ; Ren YL; Zhang RL
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():9231. PubMed ID: 25782417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantum digital signatures without quantum memory.
    Dunjko V; Wallden P; Andersson E
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Jan; 112(4):040502. PubMed ID: 24580426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Realization of quantum digital signatures without the requirement of quantum memory.
    Collins RJ; Donaldson RJ; Dunjko V; Wallden P; Clarke PJ; Andersson E; Jeffers J; Buller GS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Jul; 113(4):040502. PubMed ID: 25105603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental transmission of quantum digital signatures over 90  km of installed optical fiber using a differential phase shift quantum key distribution system.
    Collins RJ; Amiri R; Fujiwara M; Honjo T; Shimizu K; Tamaki K; Takeoka M; Andersson E; Buller GS; Sasaki M
    Opt Lett; 2016 Nov; 41(21):4883-4886. PubMed ID: 27805641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental demonstration of quantum digital signatures over 43 dB channel loss using differential phase shift quantum key distribution.
    Collins RJ; Amiri R; Fujiwara M; Honjo T; Shimizu K; Tamaki K; Takeoka M; Sasaki M; Andersson E; Buller GS
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3235. PubMed ID: 28607475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental quantum secure network with digital signatures and encryption.
    Yin HL; Fu Y; Li CL; Weng CX; Li BH; Gu J; Lu YS; Huang S; Chen ZB
    Natl Sci Rev; 2023 Apr; 10(4):nwac228. PubMed ID: 37168101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Free-Space Quantum Signatures Using Heterodyne Measurements.
    Croal C; Peuntinger C; Heim B; Khan I; Marquardt C; Leuchs G; Wallden P; Andersson E; Korolkova N
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Sep; 117(10):100503. PubMed ID: 27636461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Secure and practical multiparty quantum digital signatures.
    Weng CX; Lu YS; Gao RQ; Xie YM; Gu J; Li CL; Li BH; Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Opt Express; 2021 Aug; 29(17):27661-27673. PubMed ID: 34615178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Entanglement-based quantum digital signatures over a deployed campus network.
    Chapman JC; Alshowkan M; Qi B; Peters NA
    Opt Express; 2024 Feb; 32(5):7521-7539. PubMed ID: 38439431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental demonstration of single-shot quantum and classical signal transmission on single wavelength optical pulse.
    Kumar R; Wonfor A; Penty R; Spiller T; White I
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11190. PubMed ID: 31371765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-Quantum Security: Opportunities and Challenges.
    Li S; Chen Y; Chen L; Liao J; Kuang C; Li K; Liang W; Xiong N
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Oct; 23(21):. PubMed ID: 37960442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A New Quantum Blind Signature Scheme with BB84-State.
    Chen FL; Wang ZH; Hu YM
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Mar; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33267050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental implementation of a quantum optical state comparison amplifier.
    Donaldson RJ; Collins RJ; Eleftheriadou E; Barnett SM; Jeffers J; Buller GS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Mar; 114(12):120505. PubMed ID: 25860729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practical quantum digital signature with a gigahertz BB84 quantum key distribution system.
    An XB; Zhang H; Zhang CM; Chen W; Wang S; Yin ZQ; Wang Q; He DY; Hao PL; Liu SF; Zhou XY; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Lett; 2019 Jan; 44(1):139-142. PubMed ID: 30645569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantum signature scheme based on Hadamard and H
    Xin X; Wang Z; Yang Q
    Appl Opt; 2019 Sep; 58(27):7346-7351. PubMed ID: 31674378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient quantum digital signatures without symmetrization step.
    Lu YS; Cao XY; Weng CX; Gu J; Xie YM; Zhou MG; Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Opt Express; 2021 Mar; 29(7):10162-10171. PubMed ID: 33820149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twin-field quantum digital signatures.
    Zhang CH; Zhou X; Zhang CM; Li J; Wang Q
    Opt Lett; 2021 Aug; 46(15):3757-3760. PubMed ID: 34329274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of the multivariate polynomial public key for quantum safe digital signature.
    Kuang R; Perepechaenko M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6363. PubMed ID: 37076506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental demonstration of confidential communication with quantum security monitoring.
    Gong Y; Wonfor A; Hunt JH; White IH; Penty RV
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21686. PubMed ID: 34737374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.