These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23132199)
1. Effects of digital mammography uptake on downstream breast-related care among older women. Hubbard RA; Zhu W; Onega TL; Fishman P; Henderson LM; Tosteson AN; Buist DS Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1053-9. PubMed ID: 23132199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing health care use and cost consequences of a new screening modality: the case of digital mammography. Henderson LM; Hubbard RA; Onega TL; Zhu W; Buist DS; Fishman P; Tosteson AN Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1045-52. PubMed ID: 22922432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic imaging and biopsy pathways following abnormal screen-film and digital screening mammography. Hubbard RA; Zhu W; Horblyuk R; Karliner L; Sprague BL; Henderson L; Lee D; Onega T; Buist DS; Sweet A Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Apr; 138(3):879-87. PubMed ID: 23471650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older? Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a Medicare Claims-based Algorithm for Identifying Breast Cancers Detected at Screening Mammography. Fenton JJ; Onega T; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Henderson L; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA Med Care; 2016 Mar; 54(3):e15-22. PubMed ID: 23929404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women. McCarthy EP; Burns RB; Freund KM; Ash AS; Shwartz M; Marwill SL; Moskowitz MA J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Oct; 48(10):1226-33. PubMed ID: 11037009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities. Jackson SL; Taplin SH; Sickles EA; Abraham L; Barlow WE; Carney PA; Geller B; Berns EA; Cutter GR; Elmore JG J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jun; 101(11):814-27. PubMed ID: 19470953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using Medicare claims data. Fenton JJ; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Fishman P; Hubbard RA Med Care; 2014 Jul; 52(7):e44-51. PubMed ID: 22922433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms. Randolph WM; Mahnken JD; Goodwin JS; Freeman JL Health Serv Res; 2002 Dec; 37(6):1643-57. PubMed ID: 12546290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of Medicare claims codes for digital mammography and computer-aided detection. Fenton JJ; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Lindfors KK; Hubbard RA Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1344-7. PubMed ID: 22695737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection. Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL; JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Hubbard RA; Kerlikowske K; Flowers CI; Yankaskas BC; Zhu W; Miglioretti DL Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):481-92. PubMed ID: 22007042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring the performance of screening mammography in community practice with Medicare claims data. Freeman JL; Goodwin JS; Zhang D; Nattinger AB; Freeman DH Women Health; 2003; 37(2):1-15. PubMed ID: 12733550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Racial differences in false-positive mammogram rates: results from the ACRIN Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST). McCarthy AM; Yamartino P; Yang J; Bristol M; Conant EF; Armstrong K Med Care; 2015 Aug; 53(8):673-8. PubMed ID: 26125419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women. Goldman LE; Walker R; Miglioretti DL; Smith-Bindman R; Kerlikowske AK; Med Care; 2012 Mar; 50(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 22186768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening. McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Timeliness of abnormal screening and diagnostic mammography follow-up at facilities serving vulnerable women. Goldman LE; Walker R; Hubbard R; Kerlikowske K; Med Care; 2013 Apr; 51(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 23358386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]