These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2313283)

  • 1. Effects of ratio reinforcement schedules on choice behavior.
    Huang IN; Melvin JN
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 2313283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of reinforcement schedules on rats' choice behavior in extinction.
    Huang IN; Krukar JD; Miles SP
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Apr; 119(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 1506847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules.
    Green L; Rachlin H; Hanson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6655424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociation of theories of choice by temporal spacing of choice opportunities.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 1619396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference for unpredictable food rewards occurs with high proportion of reinforced trials or alcohol if rewards are not delayed.
    Daly HB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2926334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Momentary maximizing and optimal foraging theories of performance on concurrent VR schedules.
    MacDonall JS; Goodell J; Juliano A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 16631321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Drug self-administration studies: a novel reinforcement schedule enhances choice.
    Meisch RA; Gomez TH
    Behav Pharmacol; 2013 Jun; 24(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 23549451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice with frequently changing food rates and food ratios.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):246-74. PubMed ID: 24403110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contingency discriminability and the generalized matching law describe choice on concurrent ratio schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 22414348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice and conditioned reinforcement.
    Fantino E; Freed D; Preston RA; Williams WA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 2037826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cooperative responding in rats maintained by fixed- and variable-ratio schedules.
    de Carvalho LC; Dos Santos L; Regaço A; Barbosa TB; da Silva RF; de Souza DDG; Sandaker I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jul; 110(1):105-126. PubMed ID: 29959779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Involvement of the rat anterior cingulate cortex in control of instrumental responses guided by reward expectancy.
    Schweimer J; Hauber W
    Learn Mem; 2005; 12(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 15930509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of reinforcer quality and step size on rats' performance under progressive ratio schedules.
    Covarrubias P; Aparicio CF
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 18346855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons.
    Leigland SM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 490100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delay reduction and optimal foraging: variable-ratio search in a foraging analogue.
    Williams WA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 8207354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interlocking schedules: the relationship between response and time requirements.
    Rider DP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Jul; 28(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 903743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lever pressing responses under a fixed-ratio schedule of mice with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced dopamine depletion in the nucleus accumbens.
    Tsutsui Y; Nishizawa K; Kai N; Kobayashi K
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 217(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 20943202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.