These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2313371)
1. Using workload analysis and acuity systems to facilitate quality and productivity. Kirk R J Nurs Adm; 1990 Mar; 20(3):21-30. PubMed ID: 2313371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart. Benedetto AR Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance appraisal systems in health care administration. Wiatrowski MD; Palkon DS Health Care Manage Rev; 1987; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3557974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Promoting quality assurance through performance contracting. Christian WP; Zampini AJ Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 13(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 2315199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time documentation of clinical nurse specialist activities. Robichaud AM; Hamric AB J Nurs Adm; 1986 Jan; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3632805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linking nursing workload and performance indicators in ambulatory care. Griffin KF; Swan BA Nurs Econ; 2006; 24(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 16583604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Productivity measurement for clinical nurse specialists. Anderson EL; McCartney ES; Schreiber JA; Thompson EA Clin Nurse Spec; 1989; 3(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 2736465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subordinate performance appraisal: what nurses really want in their managers. Tayler CM Can J Nurs Adm; 1992; 5(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1463762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acuity systems dialogue and patient classification system essentials. Harper K; McCully C Nurs Adm Q; 2007; 31(4):284-99. PubMed ID: 17909428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal. Stalker MZ; Kornblith AB; Lewis PM; Parker R J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6. Martin V Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerizing assessment of workload and productivity. Silva N; Aderholdt B Nurs Manage; 1989 Nov; 20(11):49-51, 54-5. PubMed ID: 2812616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool. Fosbinder D; Vos H J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing. Megel MA Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Making performance appraisal work. Noble JE Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standards of nursing performance. Tools for assuring quality care. Miler R; Drake M QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 May; 6(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 6775261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]