These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23134194)

  • 1. Upsampling to 400-ms resolution for assessing effective connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging data with Granger causality.
    McFarlin DR; Kerr DL; Nitschke JB
    Brain Connect; 2013; 3(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 23134194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring connectivity with large-scale Granger causality on resting-state functional MRI.
    DSouza AM; Abidin AZ; Leistritz L; Wismüller A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Aug; 287():68-79. PubMed ID: 28629720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting directional influence in fMRI connectivity analysis using PCA based Granger causality.
    Zhou Z; Ding M; Chen Y; Wright P; Lu Z; Liu Y
    Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 1289():22-9. PubMed ID: 19595679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data.
    Havlicek M; Jan J; Brazdil M; Calhoun VD
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 20561919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency domain connectivity identification: an application of partial directed coherence in fMRI.
    Sato JR; Takahashi DY; Arcuri SM; Sameshima K; Morettin PA; Baccalá LA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Feb; 30(2):452-61. PubMed ID: 18064582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data.
    Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Ding JR; Chen H; Marinazzo D
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Apr; 17(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 23422254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing and compensating for zero-lag correlation effects in time-lagged Granger causality analysis of FMRI.
    Deshpande G; Sathian K; Hu X
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1446-56. PubMed ID: 20659822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing fMRI sampling rate improves Granger causality estimates.
    Lin FH; Ahveninen J; Raij T; Witzel T; Chu YH; Jääskeläinen IP; Tsai KW; Kuo WJ; Belliveau JW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100319. PubMed ID: 24968356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is Granger causality a viable technique for analyzing fMRI data?
    Wen X; Rangarajan G; Ding M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67428. PubMed ID: 23861763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating effective brain connectivity from fMRI data: past findings and current issues with reference to Granger causality analysis.
    Deshpande G; Hu X
    Brain Connect; 2012; 2(5):235-45. PubMed ID: 23016794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic framework for brain connectivity from functional MR images.
    Rajapakse JC; Wang Y; Zheng X; Zhou J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):825-33. PubMed ID: 18541489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI.
    Roebroeck A; Formisano E; Goebel R
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 15734358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of MCI using optimal sparse MAR modeled effective connectivity networks.
    Wee CY; Li Y; Jie B; Peng ZW; Shen D
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 2):319-327. PubMed ID: 24579156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying the default mode network structure using dynamic causal modeling on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Di X; Biswal BB
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():53-9. PubMed ID: 23927904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation and its relationship with dynamic functional connectivity: An application to schizophrenia.
    Fu Z; Tu Y; Di X; Du Y; Pearlson GD; Turner JA; Biswal BB; Zhang Z; Calhoun VD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):619-631. PubMed ID: 28939432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Multivariate Granger Causality Concept towards Full Brain Functional Connectivity.
    Schmidt C; Pester B; Schmid-Hertel N; Witte H; Wismüller A; Leistritz L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153105. PubMed ID: 27064897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A conditional Granger causality model approach for group analysis in functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Zhou Z; Wang X; Klahr NJ; Liu W; Arias D; Liu H; von Deneen KM; Wen Y; Lu Z; Xu D; Liu Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Apr; 29(3):418-33. PubMed ID: 21232892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective connectivity of the multiplication network: a functional MRI and multivariate Granger Causality Mapping study.
    Krueger F; Landgraf S; van der Meer E; Deshpande G; Hu X
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1419-31. PubMed ID: 20715080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pattern-based Granger causality mapping in FMRI.
    Kim E; Kim DS; Ahmad F; Park H
    Brain Connect; 2013; 3(6):569-77. PubMed ID: 24059863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.