BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23135639)

  • 1. Effect of minimizing tension during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary function recovery.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Lynch JH; Hu JC
    World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 23135639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
    Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent predictors of recovery of continence 3 months after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Kim JJ; Ha YS; Kim JH; Jeon SS; Lee DH; Kim WJ; Kim IY
    J Endourol; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1290-5. PubMed ID: 22651546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].
    Otsuki H; Kuwahara Y; Nakamura K; Tsukamoto T
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Sep; 104(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 24187850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Sivaraman A; Palmer KJ; Coughlin G; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20801579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Athermal division and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes.
    Lei Y; Alemozaffar M; Williams SB; Hevelone N; Lipsitz SR; Plaster BA; Amarasekera CA; Ulmer WD; Huang AC; Kowalczyk KJ; Hu JC
    Eur Urol; 2011 Feb; 59(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 20863611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer.
    Nyarangi-Dix JN; Tosev G; Damgov I; Reimold P; Aksoy C; Hatiboglu G; Teber D; Mansour J; Kuehhas FE; Radtke JP; Hohenfellner M
    World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):351-360. PubMed ID: 31079187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing.
    Liao PC; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Jul; 40(7):4075-4080. PubMed ID: 32620655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Huang X; Wang L; Zheng X; Wang X
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1045-1060. PubMed ID: 27444830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.
    Ilic D; Evans SM; Allan CA; Jung JH; Murphy D; Frydenberg M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD009625. PubMed ID: 28895658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Madi RH; Eden CG; Sooriakumaran P; Fransis K; Raskin Y; Joniau S; Johnson S; Jacobsohn K; Galfano A; Bocciardi AM; Hwang J; Kim IY; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 34181471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in older Australian men.
    Basto MY; Vidyasagar C; te Marvelde L; Freeborn H; Birch E; Landau A; Murphy DG; Moon D
    BJU Int; 2014 Nov; 114 Suppl 1():29-33. PubMed ID: 24825396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Porpiglia F; Morra I; Lucci Chiarissi M; Manfredi M; Mele F; Grande S; Ragni F; Poggio M; Fiori C
    Eur Urol; 2013 Apr; 63(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 22840353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.
    de Carvalho PA; Barbosa JABA; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Rocco B; Nahas WC; Patel V; Coelho RF
    Eur Urol; 2020 May; 77(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 30041833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics.
    Shikanov S; Woo J; Al-Ahmadie H; Katz MH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
    Urology; 2009 Sep; 74(3):611-6. PubMed ID: 19616830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.
    Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.