BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23135748)

  • 1. When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study?
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):416-28. PubMed ID: 23135748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metacognitive control: Shifting from habitual to agenda processes on item selection during study in elementary school children.
    Li W; Ji H; Li F; Li P; Zhang Y; Li X
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2016 Dec; 86(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 27739062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time.
    Ariel R; Al-Harthy IS; Was CA; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21735331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of individual thinking styles on item selection during study time allocation.
    Jia X; Li W; Cao L; Li P; Shi M; Wang J; Cao W; Li X
    Int J Psychol; 2018 Apr; 53(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 26987560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study.
    Dunlosky J; Ariel R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):899-912. PubMed ID: 21480756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring.
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J; Bailey H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):432-47. PubMed ID: 19653800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning what to learn: the effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time.
    Ariel R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1697-1711. PubMed ID: 23751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of perceptual information on control processes involved in self-regulated learning: evidence from item selection.
    Li F; Xie R; Li X; Li W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1007-13. PubMed ID: 25413682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Presentation Format on Younger and Older Adults' Self-Regulated Learning.
    Price J
    Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(4):391-408. PubMed ID: 28718752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allocation of Study Time in Chinese Junior School Students: Habitual Responding, Item Difficulty, and Time Constraints.
    Wang F; Qin Q; Jiang Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():639. PubMed ID: 27199865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognitive control and spaced practice: clarifying what people do and why.
    Toppino TC; Cohen MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1480-91. PubMed ID: 20822306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference.
    Allen RJ; Ueno T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1731-1743. PubMed ID: 29968084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How do students improve their value-based learning with task experience?
    DeLozier S; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2015; 23(6):928-42. PubMed ID: 25054773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's agenda-based regulation: The effects of prior performance and reward on elementary school children's study choices.
    Lipowski S; Ariel R; Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Dec; 164():55-67. PubMed ID: 28779700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selecting valuable information to remember: age-related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning.
    Castel AD; Murayama K; Friedman MC; McGillivray S; Link I
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Mar; 28(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 23276210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The salience of a reward cue can outlast reward devaluation.
    De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 131(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 28471221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beta-gamma oscillation reveals learning from unexpected reward in learners versus non-learners.
    Wang J; Zhang J; Li P; Martens S; Luo Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():266-274. PubMed ID: 31173770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
    Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Winners and losers: Reward and punishment produce biases in temporal selection.
    Le Pelley ME; Watson P; Pearson D; Abeywickrama RS; Most SB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):822-833. PubMed ID: 29985032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.