163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23135748)
21. From JOLs to JOLs+: Directing learners' attention in retrieval practice to boost integrative argumentation.
Wong SSH; Lim SWH
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):543-557. PubMed ID: 31021111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Individual differences in reinforcement learning: behavioral, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging correlates.
Santesso DL; Dillon DG; Birk JL; Holmes AJ; Goetz E; Bogdan R; Pizzagalli DA
Neuroimage; 2008 Aug; 42(2):807-16. PubMed ID: 18595740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of value-directed remembering on the own-race bias.
DeLozier S; Rhodes MG
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():62-8. PubMed ID: 25499056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners?
Cull WL; Zechmeister EB
Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 8035701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High reward makes items easier to remember, but harder to bind to a new temporal context.
Madan CR; Fujiwara E; Gerson BC; Caplan JB
Front Integr Neurosci; 2012; 6():61. PubMed ID: 22969711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Attention! Can choices for low value food over high value food be trained?
Zoltak MJ; Veling H; Chen Z; Holland RW
Appetite; 2018 May; 124():124-132. PubMed ID: 28627402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing.
Kornell N; Son LK
Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 19468957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Category learning in the context of co-presented items.
Andrews JK; Livingston KR; Kurtz KJ
Cogn Process; 2011 May; 12(2):161-75. PubMed ID: 21080030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Processing of action- but not stimulus-related prediction errors differs between active and observational feedback learning.
Kobza S; Bellebaum C
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():75-87. PubMed ID: 25446969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Position effects in encoding briefly exposed item matrices: evidence for a reading bias or merely a matter of the selection criterion?
Lass U; Yan S; Chen G; Becker D; Lüer G
Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 18841388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Motivation to Learn.
Halamish V; Madmon I; Moed A
Exp Psychol; 2019 Sep; 66(5):319-330. PubMed ID: 31603046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Agency attributions of mental effort during self-regulated learning.
Koriat A
Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):370-383. PubMed ID: 29110209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. EFL Learners' Levels of Comprehension Across Text Structures: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Descriptive and Enumerative Expository Texts.
Saadatnia M; Ketabi S; Tavakoli M
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1499-1513. PubMed ID: 26911991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How food cues can enhance and inhibit motivation to obtain and consume food.
Colagiuri B; Lovibond PF
Appetite; 2015 Jan; 84():79-87. PubMed ID: 25278431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Levels of Reading Comprehension Across Text Types: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Expository and Narrative Texts in Iranian EFL Learners.
Saadatnia M; Ketabi S; Tavakoli M
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1087-1099. PubMed ID: 28251455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning.
Delgado MR; Miller MM; Inati S; Phelps EA
Neuroimage; 2005 Feb; 24(3):862-73. PubMed ID: 15652321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intention to learn modulates the impact of reward and punishment on sequence learning.
Steel A; Baker CI; Stagg CJ
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):8906. PubMed ID: 32483289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Listeners learn phonotactic patterns conditioned on suprasegmental cues.
White KS; Chambers KE; Miller Z; Jethava V
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2560-2576. PubMed ID: 27734753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Absence of hardly pursued updating in a running memory task.
Elosúa MR; Ruiz RM
Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 17851684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
