125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23136978)
1. Systematic safety review and meta-analysis of procedural experience using percutaneous access to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Levy RM; Deer TR
Pain Med; 2012 Dec; 13(12):1554-61. PubMed ID: 23136978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression.
Mekhail N; Costandi S; Abraham B; Samuel SW
Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression for LSS: two-year outcomes.
Chopko BW
Clin J Pain; 2013 Nov; 29(11):939-43. PubMed ID: 23446067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. mild Interlaminar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: procedure description and case series with 1-year follow-up.
Wong WH
Clin J Pain; 2012 Jul; 28(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 22673487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spinal stenosis].
Zhang Z; Ren D; Sun T; Li F; Guan K; Zhao G; Shan J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 25(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 21923023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MiDAS I (mild Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): a preliminary report of a prospective, multi-center clinical study.
Chopko B; Caraway DL
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 20648206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lawrence MM; Hayek SM
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 26(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23963231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty and Decompression by Using a Visualization Reamer for Lumbar Lateral Recess and Foraminal Stenosis in Elderly Patients.
Lin YP; Wang SL; Hu WX; Chen BL; Du YX; Zhao S; Rao SY; Su GY; Lin R; Chen S; Liu JG; Yang YF; Wen Y; Liang YH; Li YJ
World Neurosurg; 2020 Apr; 136():e83-e89. PubMed ID: 31866456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New image-guided ultra-minimally invasive lumbar decompression method: the mild procedure.
Deer TR; Kapural L
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 20119461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Microendoscopic decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis].
Yang B; Chen R; Xie P; Liu B; Dong J; Rong L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 25(10):1158-63. PubMed ID: 22069964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical classification of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis based on their leg pain syndrome: its correlation with 2-year surgical outcome.
Yamashita K; Aono H; Yamasaki R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):980-5. PubMed ID: 17450073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
