491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23137034)
1. Informed consent in direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the outline of a model between specific and generic consent.
Bunnik EM; Janssens AC; Schermer MH
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):343-51. PubMed ID: 23137034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.
Bunnik EM; de Jong A; Nijsingh N; de Wert GM
Bioethics; 2013 Jul; 27(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 23718722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A tiered-layered-staged model for informed consent in personal genome testing.
Bunnik EM; Janssens AC; Schermer MH
Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Jun; 21(6):596-601. PubMed ID: 23169494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Decoding" informed consent. Insights from women regarding breast cancer susceptibility testing.
Geller G; Strauss M; Bernhardt BA; Holtzman NA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(2):28-33. PubMed ID: 9131350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personal genome testing: test characteristics to clarify the discourse on ethical, legal and societal issues.
Bunnik EM; Schermer MH; Janssens AC
BMC Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 12():11. PubMed ID: 21672210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.
Geller G; Botkin JR; Green MJ; Press N; Biesecker BB; Wilfond B; Grana G; Daly MB; Schneider K; Kahn MJ
JAMA; 1997 May; 277(18):1467-74. PubMed ID: 9145720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
de Jong A; Maya I; van Lith JM
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Autonomy, informed consent, and genetic testing: an uneasy tension.
Hamilton R; Bowers B
J Nurs Law; 2003 May; 9(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 15282895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Consent forms as part of the informed consent process: moving away from "medical Miranda".
Ali V
Hastings Law J; 2003 Jul; 54(5):1575-91. PubMed ID: 15199939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials.
Vanderpool HY
Xenotransplantation; 2009; 16(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 19799766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. RECONCEPTUALIZING CONSENT FOR DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER HEALTH SERVICES.
Spector-Bagdady K
Am J Law Med; 2015; 41(4):568-616. PubMed ID: 26863850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal and ethical myths about informed consent.
Meisel A; Kuczewski M
Arch Intern Med; 1996 Dec 9-23; 156(22):2521-6. PubMed ID: 8951294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making.
Ross LF; Rothstein MA; Clayton EW
JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 23917281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethics of managing affective and emotional states to improve informed consent: autonomy, comprehension, and voluntariness.
Braude H; Kimmelman J
Bioethics; 2012 Mar; 26(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 21039686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
Jefford M; Moore R
Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: learning from the past and looking toward the future.
Bair S
Food Drug Law J; 2012; 67(4):413-33, ii. PubMed ID: 24640615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health: a radical proposal.
Munthe C
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25521972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Gettier Problem in informed consent.
Cohen S
J Med Ethics; 2011 Nov; 37(11):642-5. PubMed ID: 21597109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
