171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23138286)
1. Opposition thaws for GM crops in Africa.
Nordling L
Nat Biotechnol; 2012 Nov; 30(11):1019. PubMed ID: 23138286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. GM crops: a continent divided.
Masood E
Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):224-6. PubMed ID: 14628018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Media leaps on French study claiming GM maize carcinogenicity.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2012 Nov; 30(11):1018. PubMed ID: 23138284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Transgenes for tea?
Heritage J
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15629853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unintended effects in genetically modified crops: revealed by metabolomics?
Rischer H; Oksman-Caldentey KM
Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):102-4. PubMed ID: 16460820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agbiotech. U.K. government panel gives GM crops cautious support.
Pickrell J
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5632):447-8. PubMed ID: 12881538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biotech crops' seal of safety does not convince skeptics.
Keogh B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Apr; 104(7):498-501. PubMed ID: 22440678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Courts upbraid USDA for 'lax review' of GM crops.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):970. PubMed ID: 19898439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Field trials excluded from UK crop appraisal.
Adam D
Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6915):453. PubMed ID: 12466806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Crop conundrum.
Dubock AC
Nutr Rev; 2009 Jan; 67(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19146502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Allergenicity testing of GM crops.
Aalberse RC
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1070-1; author reply 1071-2. PubMed ID: 18846066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops--what makes sense?
Goodman RE; Vieths S; Sampson HA; Hill D; Ebisawa M; Taylor SL; van Ree R
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18183024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk assessment of GM plants: avoiding gridlock?
Wilkinson MJ; Sweet J; Poppy GM
Trends Plant Sci; 2003 May; 8(5):208-12. PubMed ID: 12758037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices.
Hails RS
Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):685-8. PubMed ID: 12167875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice.
Paarlberg R
N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):609-13. PubMed ID: 20637906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops.
Herman RA; Garcia-Alonso M; Layton R; Raybould A
Trends Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):493-6. PubMed ID: 23973171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops.
König A; Cockburn A; Crevel RW; Debruyne E; Grafstroem R; Hammerling U; Kimber I; Knudsen I; Kuiper HA; Peijnenburg AA; Penninks AH; Poulsen M; Schauzu M; Wal JM
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1047-88. PubMed ID: 15123382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GM crops in Africa: challenges in Egypt.
Abdallah N
GM Crops; 2010; 1(3):116-9. PubMed ID: 21844668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Tempest in a tea pot: How did the public conversation on genetically modified crops drift so far from the facts?
Goldstein DA
J Med Toxicol; 2014 Jun; 10(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24798648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Messages promoting genetic modification of crops in the context of climate change: Evidence for psychological reactance.
Lu H; McComas KA; Besley JC
Appetite; 2017 Jan; 108():104-116. PubMed ID: 27677853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
